Categorized | Featured Articles

Susan Rice Said Benghazi Was A “protest” Rather Than An Attack. Isn’t That An Enormous Scandal?

This is the scandal of the century. She said “protest” instead of “attack.” Isn’t that a huge scandal that we should devote the next several months talking about to cover our defeat on November 6th?
I don’t care if the CIA reports given to her also said “protest” – that’s not the point. Is the CIA part of the Obama Administration? No. Is David Petraeus black? No. Susan Rice is, and that’s why she should be the focus of our attacks.
Susan Rice should be fired and immediately arrested.
Barack Obama should be impeached and then put on trial in Watergate-style hearings.
Eric Holder should be put on trial then arrested.
Michelle Obama should be put on trial then arrested. Lisa Jackson should be put on trial then arrested. Ron Kirk should be put on trial then arrested.
And race has nothing to do with this – it’s just a coincidence that everyone affiliated with the Obama Administration that I want to see embarrassed are all black.

No Responses to “Susan Rice Said Benghazi Was A “protest” Rather Than An Attack. Isn’t That An Enormous Scandal?”

  1. Young love says:

    Shes cleared to go. Sorry for your loss.

  2. Mr. Wolf says:

    What she said was:
    SUSAN RICE: Well, Bob, let me tell you what we understand to be the assessment at present. First of all, very importantly, as you discussed with the president, there is an investigation that the United States government will launch, led by the FBI that has begun.
    SCHIEFFER: But they are not there yet.
    RICE: They are not on the ground yet but they have already begun looking at all sorts of evidence of various sorts already available to them and to us. And they will get on the ground and continue the investigation.
    So we’ll want to see the results of that investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what — it began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video.
    But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.
    SCHIEFFER: But you do not agree with him that this was something that had been plotted out several months ago?
    RICE: We do not — we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.
    SCHIEFFER: Do you agree or disagree with him that al-Qaeda had some part in this?
    RICE: Well, we’ll have to find out that out. I mean, I think it’s clear that there were extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether they were al-Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists or al-Qaeda itself I think is one of the things we’ll have to determine.

  3. No B.S. says:

    Lord Hussein Zerobama can do no wrong, don’t you watch the news ?

  4. Nicholas says:

    It makes me mad when these news people try and say it was a protest.
    It was a full on assault and they know it.
    But why don’t they tell the truth

  5. Scooterpoop, Broadwell's other g says:

    If she were a republican, the entire liberal national media would have been demanding she step down for the last 2 months.
    Instead, liberals like Wolf above are busy adjusting what she said to try to make it look like she said something totally different. They’re lying to cover for her rather than joining Americans in making her accountable.
    Liberals like Wolf contribute to the corruption of democrats.

  6. Mjǫlnir says:

    Silly liberal troll.
    Remember when you liberals were calling Condoleezza Rice a “house ni**er?” Well, I do.

  7. Barry Chameleon says:

    It’s an outright lie, call it whatever you want. It was an outright lie perpetrated for a “reason”. hehehe

  8. Paul Jackson says:

    It’s bigger than Watergate. It could go international. I fear that she will have to be stripped of her human citizenship and destroyed with a flamethrower.

  9. Wednesday-Obama 2012 says:

    Watergate scandel number 343.
    I say Obama gets impeached for that!

  10. Mama Said Knock You Out II says:

    Terrorists are protesters= they protest with bombs.

  11. WUtangka says:

    Racism still alive they just be concealing it.

  12. MA! THE MEATLOAF! WE WANT IT! says:

    She was sent out to spin the bullshit, as we know now the quid pro quo was the top job at State. It’s incredibly simple.
    Do Americans care? Probably not, it’s Black Friday time! High def, big screen TV is in da house!!
    You always get what you want. Congrats, America, now just accept that you have what you want and stop blaming people like me.

  13. WuzUp? says:

    yes arrest Holder

  14. kelby767 says:

    Do you see anything ironic in that you are attempting to mislead by claiming that Rice was misleading?

  15. Mark F says:

    No, it isn’t. But again, you are a troll who seeks attention, not a person looking for answers.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Powered by Yahoo! Answers