Affiliate Marketing Secrets

STORY TIME. Today i received awful news, a job offering i had received from a company was being rescinded because i did not disclose information prior to a background check. The information in question was 2010 conviction for misdemeanor possession of up to 35 grams of marijuana, however according to the background check (for which HR was nice enough to furnish a copy for me) was listed in conjunction with a felony possession of a controlled substance.
Now both citations i had been arrested for in Feb 2007, however when i attended court in Feb 2010, the felony possession of a controlled substance was dropped by the Prosecuting Attorney and i plead guilty to misdemeanor possession of up to 35 grams.
Now its 2013 and the job i had until this morning is now rescinded because of a felony conviction, reported by a background check, that never happened. naturally i start by immediately calling my lawyer. he responds that according to records they on file pertaining to the specific Case Number in question resulted in a misdemeanor conviction and not a felony conviction. I am advised to search case.net (an unofficial website pertaining to court cases, supported and regulated by the missouri circuit court) and was given the 13th circuit court’s phone number as well. i check case.net, sure enough the case number in question is listed as misdemeanor possession of up to 35 grams conviction. i then go to my next source, the official 13th circuit court’s office number. after a lengthy conversation where i explain to the (very polite/helpful) lady my situation, she agrees to check the courts official database. according to the official database, the same case number is listed a felony possession of a controlled substance conviction. THATS IT? It doesn’t even list the possession of up to 35 grams conviction in conjunction with the felony conviction, just the felony conviction. After asking for an official copy of criminal records she directs me to page where i can print out/fax forms to receive the information.
Now after finding out that the case number filed under case.net and in records of my attorneys (possession of 35 grams/misdemeanor) is radically different then the exact case number filed under the 13 circuit court’s official database (possession of a controlled substance/felony), i call back my attorney to report the findings. After and lengthy hold time and man assurances that i could always leave a message, to which i said “no, ill hold as long as possible,” i speak with my attorney and report the findings. My attorney says for me to fax over my background check report and that the will pull up the specific paper work on my case located in the annex. they say it will take a day to get it out of the annex and to call back tomorrow.
So now comes my question, do i have grounds to sue on the basis of clerical error? After all the wrong conviction information was processed on the official database of the 13th circuit court, contrary to the information my lawyer has (they did bring up an abbreviated court sentence on their computers, but the specifics on my base are located at the annex), contrary to case.net the unofficial reporting site for my case number and deposition.
i’ve made plenty of mistakes in my past and did rather dumb crap, but i worked my way out of the legal hole and thought id had recused myself of the past. today i lost a good paying job with benefits, i have a B.A. degree and really thought my days of working minimum wage post graduation were over, that i had finally found my big break, a job that overlooked the known offenses i had on my record and instead looked at the qualification i met for the job. now because the information was either entered incorrectly (the most likely) or some radical conspiracy was placed against me (the most unlikely), i face a criminal record that does not match what i was convicted in court of.
if anyone can answer my question and, let alone, read the novel i have written to explain my situation, it would be greatly appreciated.

Kamal Karna Roy (also known as Kamal K.K. Roy and Rev. Dr. Joseph Geronimo, Jr.) is a prolific pro se litigant who, since at least the early 1990s, has filed numerous lawsuits throughout the United States and its territories under the names Roy and Joseph Geronimo, Jr., as well as under the names of entities that he is affiliated with, including International Siva Consciousness & World Religions, Reforms International, Handicap Interests International, and Jungle Democracy. Roy’s lawsuits are often brought against multiple defendants, and feature long, unconventional complaints. Roy has filed lawsuits against God, U.S. Presidents, Supreme Court Justices, fast food restaurants, foreign leaders., and .
Roy’s lawsuits have addressed, among many other things, actions taken by President George W. Bush, overcharging by telecommunication companies, the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts to the Supreme Court, and “failure of democratic societies and God’s role therein.” In 2006 Judge Michael W. McConnell of The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit described a typical Roy complaint:
Roy, a/k/a Joseph Geronimo, Jr. filed a 115-page complaint, a 144-page amended complaint, and a 40-page second amended complaint against over sixty defendants, including among many others President Bush, God as U.S.-based divine benefactor, several government agencies, The New York Times, and Kentucky Fried Chicken. In addition to pages of rambling discourse, the complaint contains numerous illegible handwritten remarks.
The Tenth Circuit went on to affirm the dismissal of the complaint holding that no discernible claim was apparent from the complaint. Judge McConnell also humorously noted that the court “strongly suspect at least one defendant was not properly served.”
Most, if not all, of Roy’s complaints have been dismissed. A 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware opinion, Jungle Democracy v. U.S., describes Roy as “no stranger to litigation” and provides a partial list of Roy lawsuits that have been dismissed since 1991.
Despite Roy’s lack of success in the courts, his lawsuits have been discussed in law school classrooms and in law related blogs.
In April 2007 Roy filed a civil rights action against, among others, CBS Broadcasting Inc., MSNBC, the United States Government, and controversial radio shock jock Don Imus.
In October 2007, Roy filed a suit in the US District Court, Middle District of Florida, against ” Encyclopedia, USA, All News Media, All State Board of Elections, Federal Election Commission”. See Dkt. 3:07-cv-00994-VMC-HTS.
See Also
Christopher Patterson
Citizen of the several states
Legal challenges to NSA warrantless searches in the United States
Patrick S. J. Carmack
U.S. Government disenfranchisement of U.S. citizens residing in Puerto Rico
Comments (8)
1. 14-07-2008 20:03
Wow, you just wouldn’t quit spamming Gina…
Next time you IP is going to get BANNEDs Real

Kamal Karna Roy (also known as Kamal K.K. Roy and Rev. Dr. Joseph Geronimo, Jr.) is a prolific pro se litigant who, since at least the early 1990s, has filed numerous lawsuits throughout the United States and its territories under the names Roy and Joseph Geronimo, Jr., as well as under the names of entities that he is affiliated with, including International Siva Consciousness & World Religions, Reforms International, Handicap Interests International, and Jungle Democracy. Roy’s lawsuits are often brought against multiple defendants, and feature long, unconventional complaints. Roy has filed lawsuits against God, U.S. Presidents, Supreme Court Justices, fast food restaurants, foreign leaders., and .
Roy’s lawsuits have addressed, among many other things, actions taken by President George W. Bush, overcharging by telecommunication companies, the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts to the Supreme Court, and “failure of democratic societies and God’s role therein.” In 2006 Judge Michael W. McConnell of The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit described a typical Roy complaint:
Roy, a/k/a Joseph Geronimo, Jr. filed a 115-page complaint, a 144-page amended complaint, and a 40-page second amended complaint against over sixty defendants, including among many others President Bush, God as U.S.-based divine benefactor, several government agencies, The New York Times, and Kentucky Fried Chicken. In addition to pages of rambling discourse, the complaint contains numerous illegible handwritten remarks.
The Tenth Circuit went on to affirm the dismissal of the complaint holding that no discernible claim was apparent from the complaint. Judge McConnell also humorously noted that the court “strongly suspect at least one defendant was not properly served.”
Most, if not all, of Roy’s complaints have been dismissed. A 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware opinion, Jungle Democracy v. U.S., describes Roy as “no stranger to litigation” and provides a partial list of Roy lawsuits that have been dismissed since 1991.
Despite Roy’s lack of success in the courts, his lawsuits have been discussed in law school classrooms and in law related blogs.
In April 2007 Roy filed a civil rights action against, among others, CBS Broadcasting Inc., MSNBC, the United States Government, and controversial radio shock jock Don Imus.
In October 2007, Roy filed a suit in the US District Court, Middle District of Florida, against ” Encyclopedia, USA, All News Media, All State Board of Elections, Federal Election Commission”. See Dkt. 3:07-cv-00994-VMC-HTS.
See Also
Christopher Patterson
Citizen of the several states
Legal challenges to NSA warrantless searches in the United States
Patrick S. J. Carmack
U.S. Government disenfranchisement of U.S. citizens residing in Puerto Rico
Comments (8)
1. 14-07-2008 20:03
Wow, you just wouldn’t quit spamming Gina…
Next time you IP is going to get BANNED
Guest
admin
2. 04-12-2009 18:43
heheh guess Gina got banned and admin don`t joke around with spammers 🙂
Guest
suzy
3. 02-02-2010 00:05
JUSTICE TO WEAKER PEOPLE@ USA IS ON SALE @DOORWAY OF POWERFULS@USA & door is shut @million volt danger MARK ?
Ask Answer Discover Search for questions: Advanced Search My Profile
Home > Politics & Government > Law & Ethics > Resolved Question Sangita Roy_us democracy_intrial Member since:
February 21, 2008
Total points:
16 (Level 1)
Add to My Contacts
Block User
Resolved QuestionShow me another »
Dr the rev kamal karna roy’s masterpiee based on demand & trend of love & conjugal love, familial relations o
Your Comments On…
The Last Doughboy
CHARLES TOWN, W.Va. — Numbers come precisely from the agile mind and nimble tongue of Frank Buckles, who seems bemused to say that 4,734,991 Americans served in the military during America’s involvement in the First World War and that 4,734,990 are gone. He is feeling fine, thank you for asking.
– By George F. Will
Commentsprdas01 wrote: