Affiliate Marketing Secrets

I can’t seem to find it anymore on TV. I used to watch it every morning. I live in Miami. Does anyone know at what time and what channel it comes on?

ABC news is touting that the court documents associated with the Stock Market surveillance for a bombing location did not reveal that the NSA was involved in identifying any of the persons involved.
Therefore, they conclude that the NSA and the FBI are misleading Congress when the FBI says that NSA provided leads about the plans and the participants.
Seriously, did ABC really expect the court documents to reveal the NSA’s SECRET involvement?

2 Questions:
1. Would it be “advantageous” to the Consultant” to sign this NDA, knowing it will NOT hold up in court?
2. Would this agreement, if the Company “claims” in the future that there is a breach by Consultant hold up in court at all?
Especially the “No Solicitation/Interference” section and the “Equitable Relief and Liquidated Damages” section. The Consultant is a Marketing Consultant. The “Company” is a Security Protection Company.
NON-DISCLOSURE AND NON-SOLICITATION
Confidential Information Defined. “Confidential Information” means: (a) any “trade secret” as defined in California Civil Code section 3426 et seq.; and further, (b) any information not readily accessible to the public that Consultant obtains through Company, which relates to Company’s finances, operations, clients, vendors, or other third party with whom the Company has an existing or reasonably anticipated relationship. Such Confidential Information includes, without limitation, Company’s technology, processes, products, programs, vendors, suppliers, consultants, research, development, accounting, marketing, pricing, staffing, strategies, contracts, security protocols, client lists or databases, client documents, post orders, marketing or sales proposals, and any actual or contemplated trademark, service mark, trade name or patent. The information described above is Confidential Information no matter how obtained, and regardless of whether such information is intangible (such as a fact known but not recorded), recorded in written form (such as a letter, memorandum or other document), or otherwise recorded (such as a photograph, videotape, audiotape or computer disk). Information concerning Company clients has independent economic value to the Company, and the Company has expended considerable time and effort to develop, compile and protect the confidentiality of that information.
No Solicitation/Interference. While providing services to Company or for a period of three (3) years thereafter, Consultant shall not: solicit on behalf of any entity other than Company, business from any Company client whose identity and/or interests are Confidential Information of Company. Consultant further agrees that while providing services to Company and for a period of three (3) years thereafter, Consultant shall not solicit any Company employee for employment by any competing security or event services entity. Consultant further agrees that while providing services to Company and for a period of three (3) years thereafter, Consultant shall not induce any Company client, Company employee, consultant, independent contractor, licensee or other third party to sever any relationship with Company, or to modify its business with Company on terms which are less favorable to Company.
Equitable Relief and Liquidated Damages. In addition to any other rights and remedies Company may have, any Consultant breaching this section agrees that Company, without the necessity of proving actual damages, shall be entitled to temporary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent Consultant from breaching or continuing to breach this section and that Company shall be entitled to such relief without posting bond. Because damages for such breach may be difficult to ascertain, Consultant agrees to pay to the Company the sum of one-hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) for each such breach as liquidated damages in the event that Consultant violates the terms of this section.

STORY TIME. Today i received awful news, a job offering i had received from a company was being rescinded because i did not disclose information prior to a background check. The information in question was 2010 conviction for misdemeanor possession of up to 35 grams of marijuana, however according to the background check (for which HR was nice enough to furnish a copy for me) was listed in conjunction with a felony possession of a controlled substance.
Now both citations i had been arrested for in Feb 2007, however when i attended court in Feb 2010, the felony possession of a controlled substance was dropped by the Prosecuting Attorney and i plead guilty to misdemeanor possession of up to 35 grams.
Now its 2013 and the job i had until this morning is now rescinded because of a felony conviction, reported by a background check, that never happened. naturally i start by immediately calling my lawyer. he responds that according to records they on file pertaining to the specific Case Number in question resulted in a misdemeanor conviction and not a felony conviction. I am advised to search case.net (an unofficial website pertaining to court cases, supported and regulated by the missouri circuit court) and was given the 13th circuit court’s phone number as well. i check case.net, sure enough the case number in question is listed as misdemeanor possession of up to 35 grams conviction. i then go to my next source, the official 13th circuit court’s office number. after a lengthy conversation where i explain to the (very polite/helpful) lady my situation, she agrees to check the courts official database. according to the official database, the same case number is listed a felony possession of a controlled substance conviction. THATS IT? It doesn’t even list the possession of up to 35 grams conviction in conjunction with the felony conviction, just the felony conviction. After asking for an official copy of criminal records she directs me to page where i can print out/fax forms to receive the information.
Now after finding out that the case number filed under case.net and in records of my attorneys (possession of 35 grams/misdemeanor) is radically different then the exact case number filed under the 13 circuit court’s official database (possession of a controlled substance/felony), i call back my attorney to report the findings. After and lengthy hold time and man assurances that i could always leave a message, to which i said “no, ill hold as long as possible,” i speak with my attorney and report the findings. My attorney says for me to fax over my background check report and that the will pull up the specific paper work on my case located in the annex. they say it will take a day to get it out of the annex and to call back tomorrow.
So now comes my question, do i have grounds to sue on the basis of clerical error? After all the wrong conviction information was processed on the official database of the 13th circuit court, contrary to the information my lawyer has (they did bring up an abbreviated court sentence on their computers, but the specifics on my base are located at the annex), contrary to case.net the unofficial reporting site for my case number and deposition.
i’ve made plenty of mistakes in my past and did rather dumb crap, but i worked my way out of the legal hole and thought id had recused myself of the past. today i lost a good paying job with benefits, i have a B.A. degree and really thought my days of working minimum wage post graduation were over, that i had finally found my big break, a job that overlooked the known offenses i had on my record and instead looked at the qualification i met for the job. now because the information was either entered incorrectly (the most likely) or some radical conspiracy was placed against me (the most unlikely), i face a criminal record that does not match what i was convicted in court of.
if anyone can answer my question and, let alone, read the novel i have written to explain my situation, it would be greatly appreciated.

alright well, my daughter and i live in the state of massachusetts. im a single mother and shes 13. she had a severe anxiety disorder along with rarely severe OCD. it contains her and i both to the house. she throws up constantly from stress, and had back problems from holding so many knots back there. we both cry at least once a day usualy, and the condidtion she lives with is horrible. we are both very spiritual, so dont get us wrong, we love god and we feel blssed that it isnt something more than this. anyway, do to mydaughters severe condition, it was getting hard for her to hand write because her OCD and anxiety always gave her bad thoughts in her head, and when she would write words on a paper at the same time of thinking those bad thoughts, she would feel like it would definetly happen, since the bad thoughts would get cought between the pencil and the paper, or something like that, im not really sure how she discribed it. so her work strted to fall behind and her teachers started to give her more stress, so she ended up crying in school, which is something she hasnt done k or 1st grade. shes a very stong girl!so it was so hard for me to watch my baby go through this everyday, she stayed home for about 2 months. then the school filed against us. so we went to court and the judge ruled that she had to go to school. after court is over im going to try to get her into some sort of program such as home tutoring so she can not be so stressed, (at least until her meds start working.) before the whole court thing came up i was on the right track with this but them when the truency issue came up, they started ignoring me! i cannot homeschool because as a single mother i have to make a living. i dont know what to do anymore! shes even been asessed at a mental hospital! pls help me! do i have any options after the whole court thing is over?
btw- my daughter has always been in spectrum and the top classes since she was 8 years old, she doesnt usually get lower than an eighty on a test, and she is very bright.
sorry this was so long, i just want help for my daughter! thank you so much!

1.
The mountain man of the West
A) was, in his own way, as caught up in the national integrated economic network as a farmer.
B) illustrated that some Americans lived beyond the reach of the market economy.
D) functioned as an independent businessman, vulnerable to the market but at least able to be his own boss in an enterprise not yet dominated by large eastern organizations.
2.
Indian economies with which new Americans came into contact were primarily based on
A) hunting and gathering.
B) semisubsistence agriculture like that of whites.
D) None of these answers is correct.
3.
Which of the following was NOT one of the goals that underlay Alexander Hamilton’s financial proposals?
A) stimulate the essentially virtuous nature of ordinary citizens, who could take advantage of new economic opportunities
D) make the U.S. as a whole independent of European control by strengthening it economically
4.
Which of the following was NOT a charge raised by opponents to Hamilton’s program?
A) It violated the idea of a broad or loose construction of the Constitution.
C) It threatened to lead to English-style monarchism and corruption.
5.
The Federalist party
A) wanted a weak government in order to promote economic individualism.
B) opposed a republican form of government.
D) wanted to use government power to promote commerce and industry.
6.
In the XYZ Affair,
B) French officials demanded a bribe to open negotiations with the United States.
C) Adams broke with his party and sent a new peace commission to France.
D) the United States agreed to end the Quasi-War.
7.
Which of the following does NOT accurately state a principle that Jefferson espoused?
A) People may be trusted to make political choices based on correct principles.
B) Radical change is periodically necessary to make sure that equality and democracy continue to be extended to all men and women of all races and faiths.
C) Human reason is the powerful tool that will unlock the secrets of nature and improve human society.
8.
The Louisiana Purchase was significant for all of the following reasons, EXCEPT that
A) Jefferson’s constitutional scruples caused him to hesitate to act in the Republic’s best interests.
B) it illustrated Jefferson’s enthusiastic interest in the West.
C) it illustrated America’s continued ties to world power politics.
9.
What kind of vessel did the Barbary states use to plunder the cargo of enemy ships and enslave their crews if tribute was not paid?
A) corvair
C) corvette
D) corsair
10.
The Hartford Convention (1814) was
A) a meeting of New England literary figures.
D) a protest meeting of anti-war New Englanders.
11.
The Monroe Doctrine
A) proclaimed that the U.S. would be a continental nation.
B) warned Europe not to interfere in the Americas.
12.
The War of 1812
B) ended in a treaty that granted generous concessions to the U.S.
C) produced no significant American victories.
D) was followed by a surge of American nationalism.
13.
A chief characteristic of a commercial economy was that it required
A) the availability of relatively cheap transportation.
C) inequality in the distribution of wealth.
D) more materialistic and acquisitive values.
14.
The Alien and Sedition Acts were used primarily
A) to weaken the Republican party.
C) against immigrants and aliens.
D) against French- and Spanish-sponsored intrigue.
15.
At best, Jefferson considered government
A) the highest calling a person could aspire to.
B) inherently good.
D) a necessary evil.
16.
One of the more important results of the presidential election of 1800 is that it
A) convinced both Federalists and Republicans that a two-party system was preferable.
B) was won with no opposition candidate.
C) brought Washington to office for a third term.
D) None of these answers is correct.
17.
What larger social pattern helps explain the clashes between whites and Indians on the Ohio frontier and, more specifically, their resort to both religious renewal movements and abusive consumption of increased quantities of alcohol?
A) Neither tribal villages nor backcountry villages felt any cultural or economic need for the other.
B) Traditional cultural systems were breaking down, creating great cultural stress.
D) Both groups had abandoned their religious roots and rejected calls to return to traditional beliefs.
18.
Once in power, Jefferson
A) fully dismantled Hamilton’s economic program.
B) respected the independence of the judiciary.
D) increasingly put pragmatic considerations above strict political principles.
19.
According to the doctrine established in the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison,
A) the high court could rule on the constitutionality of federal laws.
B) the high court could compel public officials to perform their duties.
D) the judicial branch should defer to the wishes of the legislative branch.