Affiliate Marketing Secrets

I have to services that i wish to market as stand alone services. Although they relate to fitness, they are 2 different niches. I have one website domain name that i am currently utilizing for one of the fitness services. I do not have a domain name for the other service. I plan to market all of the services via social media and email marketing. I do not have the budget to establish another website for the additional service.
How do i market both services on social media platforms effectively without combining them and confusing one with the other?
I welcome all suggestions!

From Elementary to my sophomore year of high school I wasn’t necessarily considered “ugly” but more plain to be exact. Almost no attractive girl acknowledged me as good looking. They thought I was goth just because my hair was naturally pitch black along with my fair skin. Then the summer before my junior year I started changing my look a bit and people looked at me like I was a different person. I started straightening my hair and wearing clothes from Abercrombie, Aeropostale, Banana Republic etc. Then in my senior year I competed in this fundraiser for my prom which involved a beauty pageant for guys. I became popular after that and got hit on by some of the girls that ignored me before. I am in college now and I am getting flirty remarks from many. I feel as if because of the mental and vain torture I experienced has given me the impression to be cynical about every girl that hits on me.

This was on an open, public facebook account with my name tagged into the photo. I didn’t know I was tagged until just yesterday, where I promptly untagged myself and reported the comments. Before untagging myself, I took a video of all the comments made. The photo had me and a “supposed friend” at a party. These statements were made on December 28th, 2010. I was tagged with these statements for 2.5 years. My picture is still affiliated with these statements. This has been reported to facebook.
Individuals 1 and 2 I knew from high school. Individual 1 harassed me in high school and then later in college. We never interacted–we never hung out or talked to each other. He hated me from the start and it was until much later that I learned it was because I was dating a girl he liked. This continued for several years. I was afraid of him in high school and is the reason why I learned martial arts. Individual 2 I knew in high school. We rarely interacted individually unless a group of friends were present. Otherwise, lengthy conversations never took place.
Individual 3 I only knew threw my ex’s (girlfriend at the time) brother as he was dating individual 3. I considered her as a friend, but later learned that she never liked me from the beginning. Through slander and libel, she caused me a lot of grief. I lost friends, had major depression and anxiety, and had people approach me for things I hadn’t done, for which both my ex and her brother denied and defended me for. I am still friends with my ex and her brother.
Individuals 1, 2, and 3 were all friends at the time. Individual 1 is no longer friends with individual 2 or 3. Individuals 2 and 3 are still friends. They have been known to turn fact into fiction with grandiose exaggeration.
Two of the individuals I knew from high school. The first individual and I talked every now and then, but never hung out. The second individual simply hated me from the beginning because I was dating a girl he liked. This I didn’t know. I was afraid of this individual in high school. High school graduation was 2007. The third individual I had only met recently through a friend, but had minimal interaction with, which changed over time as she became slanderous to my name. Other people randomly came up to me angry for things that had never transpired. Due to the slander, I lost several “friends.”
These are direct quotes.
Individual 1: “I hate that guy so much :P”
Individual 2: “I know! He is such a jerk, I mean look at this photo, he clearly doesn’t understand me so his blood vessels exploded everywhere.”
Individual 1: “What an ***.”
Individual 2: “Exactly. I hate him. :'(”
Individual 1: “Let’s sell him off to aggregate farmers in Nepal.”
Individual 2 (This quote in particular was shocking and upsetting):
“I was going to kill him but that plan makes money and less blood is involved. I second
that motion.”
Individual 1: Passed.
Individual 2: “I just noticed that (my name) and I have photos of him and I. Yep, totally hate him.”
Individual 1: “What a fagmuffin.”
Individual 2: “Oh totally. Wait, no, he is pumpkin spice.”
I don’t entirely understand that statement.
Individual 3: “That’s totally what happens when (my name) pisses me off. See? He’s even hanging his
head in shame of what he obviously did wrong.”
Individual 2: “Sooo true. This is why we hate him.”
I am highly educated in science, but not with the law.
Would this be a case for libel, something else, or perhaps nothing at all?

I have a Facebook Fan Page that consists of 136k likes. 75% Female 50% 18-24. I know there are endless opportunities for people like myself with this kind of fan base but there’s one problem. The Fan Page that I have consists of derogetory content in the name.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-used-to-cry-when-I-got-hurt-until-i-learned-the-word-FK/391422063012
That is my page, feel free to like it as well, what do I do next?!?! I have a completely open mind and am willing to work with someone and affiliate myself directly into your online social media network as well. Looking forward to your answers!

Republican administrations always tout the free market, but when it clashes with the perceived interests of the national security state—of which they are so fond—it gets outgunned. The most recent example is the Bush administration’s threats against a liquefied natural gas pipeline that would run from Iran through Pakistan to India. The administration wants to put the screws (to stop) to anything that would benefit Iran—a member of President Bush’s “axis of evil.” A less jingoistic and more enlightened administration would realize that through free commerce among the rival groups in this region, this pipeline would help poor countries to develop economically, and at the same time reduce the likelihood of conflict and enhance U.S. security in the process. South Asia, the proposed route of the pipeline, is probably the most dangerous region in the world. In recent years, archrivals India and Pakistan have both tested nuclear weapons and come close to nuclear war. Pakistan supports guerillas in the disputed Indian region of Kashmir, a potential flashpoint for nuclear escalation. Although India primarily wants the so-called “peace pipeline” to deliver badly needed energy to a rapidly growing economy, it sees the pipeline’s role in improving relations with Pakistan as a major side benefit. Economic links among potential adversaries can create peace lobbies in those countries because much money can be lost if a war starts. Thus, commerce may very well reduce the chances of war—in this case, an Indo-Pakistani nuclear war with dramatic global implications.International commerce can also open up despotic regimes to Western ideas, including those of liberty and human rights. This happens slowly over time, however, and the Bush administration has little patience for the approach. In fact, the administration desires more rapid results through coercion both economic and military. The United States has long restricted commerce with Iran and is apparently readying plans to attack that country. According to investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, administration planning for an attack on Iran is in the advanced stages and has included U.S. Special Forces missions on Iranian territory to identify key targets. Certainly, Iran has an autocratic regime that has committed human rights abuses, likely has a secret program to develop nuclear weapons, and has sponsored terrorist attacks. But the regime is only a limited threat to U.S. security. Recently, Iran’s sponsorship of terrorist attacks has been against Israel, not the United States. Furthermore, even if the worst case comes to pass—Iran gets a few nuclear weapons—the U.S. arsenal of thousands of nuclear warheads would most likely deter an Iranian nuclear attack on America (that is, if Iran ever produced a missile that could deliver a nuclear payload at such great distances). The U.S. arsenal deterred radical Maoist China from launching a nuclear attack on the United States after the Chinese obtained atomic weapons in the 1960s. The primary goal of even ideologically zealous regimes is self-preservation; getting their home countries incinerated is counterproductive to the spread of their ideology. Any military attack designed to target Iranian nuclear-related facilities is unlikely to destroy them all—because U.S. intelligence on such installations is limited—and is likely to deliver a pro-Western Iranian population back into the arms of the thuggish regime. Economic coercion against Iran is also likely to have a counterproductive result. Forty-five years of economic sanctions against Fidel Castro’s regime in Cuba have merely allowed him to rally the Cuban population against the “Yankee oppressor.” Although counterintuitive, allowing free commerce with both Iran and Cuba would have gradually allowed Western products, services, and ideas to chip away at the oppressive ideologies of both governments. But the implications of U.S. economic coercion against the pipeline are far broader than their effects on Iran. To stop the proposed Iran-Pakistan-India natural gas pipeline from being built, the Bush administration is threatening India with the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, which allows the president to penalize any company that invests more than $20 million per year in Iran’s energy sector. This sanction is called an extraterritorial measure, because it not only penalizes the target nation, but third nations and companies that have commercial relationships with the target nation, as well. Such measures are especially pernicious to the international commercial system. The Bush administration’s refusal to look at the big picture and realize that free commerce is also the best national security policy is puzzling and troubling. The administration has realized the danger to the world of nuclear war in South Asia and has supported the Indo-Pakistani peace process. however, it is also trying to block the peace pipeline, which would foster economic cooperation between the two bitter…

Hi everyone! I want to create a lead magnet for weight loss and I want to know how I can find specific niches in the weight loss area and can you help me with as many niches as possible.Thanks