Affiliate Marketing Secrets

Ok way back the wingmakers.com site launched, it’s a site that incorporates philosophy and mythology with a bunch of wild ideas that contradicts the current norms and beliefs. Many debunked the site, and shouted hoax. Recently 2 new sites launced glcoherence.org and heartmath.org, they follow the general theme of the first site however takes a “scientific approach”. The creator of wingmakers, Mark Hempel, is connected to these new sites as a board member of glcoherence and actively endorses heartmath. Does the outlandish ideas of wingmakers discredit these orginizations, or do these scientific claims actually verify their philosophies.
Now, I tried looking for a response of the scientific community on heartmath and the global coherence initiative, however I couldn’t find any articles that discredit, critique or even offer a peer review, although it is all over spirituality focused forums and they spam “peer-reviewed” on most of their pages.
In most and any scientific claims or theories you’ll find other orginizations that are not affiliated with it, to offer their own findings either validating or discredting them, however I can’t find any. And with claims and theories as big as these why isnt there any or even a little media coverage?
Can anyone that is familiar with this topic link to a scientific review of their claims or comment on them or just offer your view on this. Do you think that they’re just hoaxing everyone to sell their music, books, courses and heartmath devices? Or does it actually hold some truth?

chairman running 2 colleges in the same building i.e degree course and graduation course both are affiliated from different university .they also did’t paying salary according to AICTE norms just giving 8-10 thousand Rs to all the staff members.i did’t come in front but give the proper information according that matter.

Hi,
I am writing an essay and English is not my native language. Please, check my text for mistakes, thanks:
“The State also promoted the reduction of the levels of negotiation by activity branch, favoring the companies where the union power was less. Other norms promoted by the State were: a strike hyper-regulatory mechanism that leaded to declare them illegal most of the times, the instability of the collective agreements as to the time of the agreed benefits and the integral revision of the existing ones, and the possibility of receiving just one compensation before an arbitrary dismissal, becoming difficult to reach the reinsertion to the job, among other measures.
What effects did these changes have in the labor organizations? According to the report of Smith, in terms of its relation with the environment, the DGTB was unable to avoid the disaffiliation and reach that new sectors affiliate to company labor unions.”
Rachel

According to the norms to appear in CTET , I have one doubt and I’ll be obliged if someone throw some light on it according to the minimum qualification to appear in CTET for class VI -VIII there is one clause which says —-B.A. /B.Sc. with at least 45% marks and passed or appearing in 1–year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed)*, in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard. Does that mean people having < 50% with B.ED can appear for CTET.
I'm working as a teacher in a private affiliated school as well as I'm doing B.Ed from IGNOU through distance mode and my marks in B.Sc is 49.74% . Do you think I can appear in CTET based on the above clause. I'll be obliged if you send your reply.MY email-id is anamika_bot@yahoo.co.in
What does this particular sentence means—-1–year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed)*,in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard.