Affiliate Marketing Secrets

It’s no secret that the Tea party claims to follow the constitution like a 2nd bible. That being said, why don’t Tea Party Republicans seriously consider repealing the 21 drinking age for everyone (not just members of the military). That would be very consistent with their ideology, since the federal government and the supreme court B S-ed their way around the constitution when the law was passed. Plus, remember that the Tea Party marketed itself as an organization that defends freedom. If they truly defend freedom, then they should be against the government telling legal adults what types of beverages they can have and at what age. What do you say?

It’s no secret that the Tea party claims to follow the constitution like a 2nd bible. That being said, why don’t Tea Party Republicans seriously consider repealing the 21 drinking age for everyone (not just members of the military). That would be very consistent with their ideology, since the federal government and the supreme court B S-ed their way around the constitution when the law was passed. Plus, remember that the Tea Party marketed itself as an organization that defends freedom. If they truly defend freedom, then they should be against the government telling legal adults what types of beverages they can have and at what age. What do you say?

It’s no secret that the Tea party claims to follow the constitution like a 2nd bible. That being said, why don’t Tea Party Republicans seriously consider repealing the 21 drinking age for everyone (not just members of the military). That would be very consistent with their ideology, since the federal government and the supreme court B S-ed their way around the constitution when the law was passed. Plus, remember that the Tea Party marketed itself as an organization that defends freedom. If they truly defend freedom, then they should be against the government telling legal adults what types of beverages they can have and at what age. What do you say?

I believe in God – He is incorporeal, and supreme – there is no trinity, or whatever. I believe that you don’t have to believe in Him to get to an afterlife – all that matters is HOW you conduct yourself in this life. I believe that he LOVES everyone – regardless if you’re an atheist, Muslim, Christian, homosexual or not, or whatever.
However, I don’t believe in Jesus. I see him as a historical figure, and that’s all it is for me.
What are my beliefs called? I’m kind of sick of having to tell people my religious beliefs “I believe in God but I’m not affiliated with a religion or a faith.” It’s a bit of a hassle.

Kamal Karna Roy (also known as Kamal K.K. Roy and Rev. Dr. Joseph Geronimo, Jr.) is a prolific pro se litigant who, since at least the early 1990s, has filed numerous lawsuits throughout the United States and its territories under the names Roy and Joseph Geronimo, Jr., as well as under the names of entities that he is affiliated with, including International Siva Consciousness & World Religions, Reforms International, Handicap Interests International, and Jungle Democracy. Roy’s lawsuits are often brought against multiple defendants, and feature long, unconventional complaints. Roy has filed lawsuits against God, U.S. Presidents, Supreme Court Justices, fast food restaurants, foreign leaders., and .
Roy’s lawsuits have addressed, among many other things, actions taken by President George W. Bush, overcharging by telecommunication companies, the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts to the Supreme Court, and “failure of democratic societies and God’s role therein.” In 2006 Judge Michael W. McConnell of The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit described a typical Roy complaint:
Roy, a/k/a Joseph Geronimo, Jr. filed a 115-page complaint, a 144-page amended complaint, and a 40-page second amended complaint against over sixty defendants, including among many others President Bush, God as U.S.-based divine benefactor, several government agencies, The New York Times, and Kentucky Fried Chicken. In addition to pages of rambling discourse, the complaint contains numerous illegible handwritten remarks.
The Tenth Circuit went on to affirm the dismissal of the complaint holding that no discernible claim was apparent from the complaint. Judge McConnell also humorously noted that the court “strongly suspect at least one defendant was not properly served.”
Most, if not all, of Roy’s complaints have been dismissed. A 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware opinion, Jungle Democracy v. U.S., describes Roy as “no stranger to litigation” and provides a partial list of Roy lawsuits that have been dismissed since 1991.
Despite Roy’s lack of success in the courts, his lawsuits have been discussed in law school classrooms and in law related blogs.
In April 2007 Roy filed a civil rights action against, among others, CBS Broadcasting Inc., MSNBC, the United States Government, and controversial radio shock jock Don Imus.
In October 2007, Roy filed a suit in the US District Court, Middle District of Florida, against ” Encyclopedia, USA, All News Media, All State Board of Elections, Federal Election Commission”. See Dkt. 3:07-cv-00994-VMC-HTS.
See Also
Christopher Patterson
Citizen of the several states
Legal challenges to NSA warrantless searches in the United States
Patrick S. J. Carmack
U.S. Government disenfranchisement of U.S. citizens residing in Puerto Rico
Comments (8)
1. 14-07-2008 20:03
Wow, you just wouldn’t quit spamming Gina…
Next time you IP is going to get BANNED
Guest
admin
2. 04-12-2009 18:43
heheh guess Gina got banned and admin don`t joke around with spammers 🙂
Guest
suzy
3. 02-02-2010 00:05
JUSTICE TO WEAKER PEOPLE@ USA IS ON SALE @DOORWAY OF POWERFULS@USA & door is shut @million volt danger MARK ?
Ask Answer Discover Search for questions: Advanced Search My Profile
Home > Politics & Government > Law & Ethics > Resolved Question Sangita Roy_us democracy_intrial Member since:
February 21, 2008
Total points:
16 (Level 1)
Add to My Contacts
Block User
Resolved QuestionShow me another »
Dr the rev kamal karna roy’s masterpiee based on demand & trend of love & conjugal love, familial relations o
Your Comments On…
The Last Doughboy
CHARLES TOWN, W.Va. — Numbers come precisely from the agile mind and nimble tongue of Frank Buckles, who seems bemused to say that 4,734,991 Americans served in the military during America’s involvement in the First World War and that 4,734,990 are gone. He is feeling fine, thank you for asking.
– By George F. Will
Commentsprdas01 wrote:

A key liberal group and Vice President Biden renewed unsubstantiated charges Monday that foreign money is bankrolling political activity to support Republicans in the crucial midterm elections.
The latest broadsides came on two fronts. MoveOn.org Political Action released a new ad attacking Illinois Republican Senate nominee Mark Kirk for his ties to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and claiming it receives funds from Chinese and Russian companies that “threaten American jobs.” Biden, meanwhile, repeated an assertion first made by President Obama that some of the vast sums flowing to independent groups for ads might come from “foreign sources.” Neither offered proof that foreign money is paying for ads.
The chamber, which has pledged to pump $75 million into the congressional elections, adamantly denies it has used any dues from foreign affiliates for politics. Bruce Josten, the chamber’s top lobbyist, called the charges an attempt to “demonize specific groups” and “distract Americans from a failed economic agenda.”
It is illegal for foreign companies to contribute directly to American political campaigns.
Campaign-finance experts, however, say it is impossible to verify Democrats’ claims of foreign involvement in campaigns because federal law does not require non-profits, such as the chamber, to publicly disclose their sources of funding or certify that overseas contributions do not pay for ads.
“Are foreign companies involving themselves in the current election? The answer largely is: Who knows?” said Dave Levinthal of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign money.
“Both sides are being somewhat disingenuous,” he said. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and other groups allied with the party have presented no proof of their allegations. Meanwhile, Levinthal said, conservative groups “aren’t exactly rushing to volunteer information.”
The controversy has erupted as Democrats face a flood of outside spending benefiting Republican candidates in the sprint to Election Day. Between Sept. 1 and Oct. 6, conservative organizations such as American Crossroads, spent nearly $26 million on political activity that calls for the election and defeat of specific congressional candidates, according to the center’s tally. That’s more than four times the amount spent by liberal groups, such as Defenders of Wildlife, during the same period.
The new spending is spurred, in part, by a Supreme Court ruling last January that opened the door to unlimited corporate money for ads that specifically target candidates.
Republicans “are being incredibly aggressive and for good reason,” Levinthal said. “There’s the very real opportunity that they could win back the House, and perhaps have an outside chance at the Senate,” he said.
The Republicans need a net gain of 39 seats in the House of Representatives and 10 in the Senate to take control of Congress.
MoveOn spokeswoman Ilyse Hogue defended the anti-Kirk ad, which it plans to air in Chicago and central Illinois. She said the burden is on the chamber to prove it is not funneling foreign money to politics. “The chamber could put this all to rest so easily … by simply allowing an independent audit.” Kirk spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski called MoveOn “an extreme liberal group” that is out of sync with “mainstream Illinois voters.”
In recent days, Obama has argued foreign money was funding conservative campaign ads, without naming the Chamber of Commerce.
Others with close ties to the president have been more direct. A DNC ad, for instance, said the chamber “shills for big business” and appears to take “secret foreign money to influence our elections.”
On Monday, Biden hit on the theme again during a campaign swing through Pennsylvania. “It bothers me, all these unattributed contributions,” he said during a speech outside Scranton. “Where is all this money from?”
Obama first raised the specter of foreign funds flowing into U.S. elections during his State of the Union Address this year, in which he lambasted the Supreme Court’s decision. In recent months, Senate Republicans have blocked consideration of Democratic legislation that would require new disclosure in political advertising, including mandating that CEOs appear in ads they helped fund.
Allegations of campaign-finance irregularities are unlikely to resonate with most voters unless there’s clear proof of illegal activity, said Gary Jacobson, a political scientist at University of California-San Diego. “What people care about is the economy,” he said. “This is a sideshow.”