Affiliate Marketing Secrets

The Illuminati were supposedly established hundreds of years ago (some accounts say thousands but it seems to vary based on your source), consisting exclusively of 13 incredibly wealthy and influential families. The Rockefeller family, though, only became financially and politically significant through John D Rockefeller in the late 19th-early 20th century — does this not totally debunk the theory that the Illuminati have existed for much more than a century?

I’m currently in my junior year of high school. I really hate it. I have a lot of friends in theory, but no best friends so I spend most of my time alone anyhow. I never found my niche, so even when I’m in a group of people I feel isolated and secluded.
I don’t think I have gained anything from my high school social experience
I have severe scoliosis and neck trauma so my back pack causes ongoing pain and posture issues. i get less than 6 hours of sleep most nights, which has affected my overall health. I participate in a number of activities outside of school and would busy myself with going to the gym, my internship, volunteering, and writing (my dream is to publish before I graduate.)
I like the idea of moving at my own pace, since I excel in history and english and need more time in math a science. In fact, my focus issues make it so that I have to self teach myself most of the science curriculum anyhow from power points.
I took an online class for school and did a fantastic job. I am great at time mgmt. and got an a+ and excellent comments.
Would this be right for me? I’m so miserable in traditional high school, I’d love to know there was another option out there.

First of all, I am only asking this question about true dinosaurs. I am aware of, but not asking about: Pelycosaurs, which lived before the dinosaurs; or Crocodilians, which lived before, with, and after them, etc…. It seems that every purely carnivorous dinosaur fossil we have found has been a two-legged Therapod. We have found bipedal herbivorous dinosaurs, but no quadrupedal carnosaurs. Is there a theory as to a reason behind this? Were Therapods simply first and “guarded their niche” successfully, or is there a good reason why a quadrupedal carnosaur wouldn’t be successful. Or, is it simply that we haven’t found their fossils yet?

This question here I believe is a big one that the entire human race needs to rethink.
Which animals deserve protection? How do we choose which animals to protect by law and which ones not to protect? Which animals should we rightly kill and when does killing cross the line? The human race appears confused when it comes to these questions as we have a large tendency to contradict ourselves ( of course we contradict ourselves in most everything we do! ) Here is a proposed way to answer these questions.
RELAVANCE!!!! If an ant is killed either on accident, on purpose, or eaten for food. Its life can be easily replaced by another in the hive. Ants reproduce quickly so a single casualty is not much of a loss. The blandings turtle takes up to 15 years to reach sexual maturity. A single death of an adult or juvinile blandings turtle has the potential to influence the entire population! Therefore by the relevance theory the blandings turtle should recieve more legal protection than the ant.
All theories have flaws when it comes to philosophy! Of course I know we should never stick with just one but bring together a diversity of ideas to formulate our own personal opinion. Here are some of the flaws I have identified with the Relevance theory.
1. Endangered species- If an animal population is dying out who is to say if the species is worth saving or not? Once a species becomes rare its ecological significance usualy drops.
Ex: the giant panda feeds mainly on bamboo, which was previously a plentyful resource. Today bamboo is scarce so humans spend tons of money trying to save the pandas. Because the need for a creature to keep bamboo in check is gone, the panda no longer serves as important of a niche. How do we decide if it is worth saving or not?
2. Invasive species- when are they beneficial and when aren’t they? Should we judge this solely on how well it fits into a new niche?
Ex: Burmese pythons are loose in southern United States. Some argue that they do not belong and eat animals that shouldn’t be eaten. Others argue that humans destroyed other predators that previously fed on these animals and the snakes are taking advantage of a wide open niche. What should we do?
3. Personal preference- don’t lie to yourself, humans favor some animals over others just because we want to. Cats and dogs will always have more protection than snakes and insects. When is it approperiate to listen to reason and when is it aproperiate to listen to our personal desires?
Ex: Lets say a feral cat comes by and eats a pet duck. Now lets say a burmese python comes by and eats a pet duck. For killing the snake I would be praised for removing an innvasive species, for killing the cat I could be arrested for animal cruelty.
I tried to keep this question neutral ( although bias is inevitable ). When answering look at these details as topics for discusion, do not hold them as my own personal opinions!
If you also believe this is an important thing for humans to consider star this question as important!

I’ve done a lot of digging on different theories that explain reality, with string theory (and all of its affiliates) appearing to be the most merited explanation. Searching for answers always leads to more questions, of course.
M-theory and the 11 dimensions that supposedly exist (assuming this is the correct theory) holds that there are limitless universes parallel to ours that hold that every possible outcome to anything will happen in these unlimited “bubbles” of universes. This seems a little bit iffy in light of the following question I will ask.
What I wanted to ask is; life is created in a way to perceive what best suits its own survival and nothing more. Therefor, is it not highly likely that there are no means to perceive any of these dimensions because the tiny niche of existence we occupy will simply not permit it? If there are particles that exist right in front of us that do not have the capacity to interact with the forms of matter that we can interact with, then is there simply no way of observing them?
I want to know A) What evidence points to the existence of the theoretical particles (Higs bosons/field, tachyons, etc) B) what makes these theoretical particles necessary in order for the math to work, and C) How much matter/particles/inter dimensional debris/etc is hypothesized to be undiscovered or completely undiscoverable?

After watching every movie, documentary, and videos on 2pac and biggie, i have a theory on what happened. When 2pac got shot in new york, he felt like he was set up by biggie bcuz prior to that incident, biggie had mentioned to 2pac about this “bad guy” that biggie knew who was bad news and told 2pac to stay away from him. this “bad guy” was one of the men who shot 2pac in new york, so 2pac felt like biggie knew what happened, thus feeling like he was set up by biggie and this started the huge fued… 2pac always hung out and was affiliated with gangs in LA such as the bloods so he obviously had enemies even though 2pac never claimed to be a gang member. In las vegas, 2pac and his friends (suge knight, etc…) beat up a LA crip member, so obviously the crips were going to retaliate, especially on 2pac since he was well known, thus the shooting in las vegas… biggie smalls didnt have anything to do with the las vegas shooting but im pretty sure friends and ppl close to 2pac might have thought other wise so in retaliation they murdered biggie in their home city of LA… Suge knight pretty much ran streets in LA during this time, he had the most money, the most power, and everyone feared him, LAPD was known for corruptions, so im pretty sure suge hired a active or former corrupt cop to murder biggie…