Why do Americans think that social identity ought to be defined by one’s parentage; whereas on the other hand, the spiritual leader Sri Sathya Sai Baba was born into a poor family, and presumably his parents are low-caste Shudras, but he is generally regarded as “God in human form” by large numbers of non-affiliated people in India, and across the globe?
Note: Remember, a spiritual avatar is HIGHER than the Brahmin caste in India. Mahatma Ghandi was considered to be HIGHER than a Brahmin. The spiritual pecking order is organized in rank descending order: God, Buddha, Bodisatva, Mahatma, Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra, and Dalit.
How does one explain the fact that Sai Baba is still regarded as “God in human form”, although his parents are low-caste Shudras?
Are we not agree about the fact that Jesus Christ is spiritually more advanced than both his parents who are not to be compared with God the Supreme Being?
people do this all the time
Yes. In American contractual law, you can repudiate a contract with anyone.
Many deadbeat dads already do that. So do some mothers. I’ve seen sad cases of both.
As to some stranger who does this — that’s their problem and I could care less how others may view the person.
All shall repudiate the flesh upon passing from this world into the next.
Hallelujah!
Americans don’t think that. I’ll bet you that way less than 1% of Americans can even name Barack Obama’s parents.