Posted on 08 July 2012. Tags: Answer, bill gates, carla homolka, curiosity, economy, freedom, hells angels, horrible crimes, monopolization, oligopolies, stable economy, tim horton, totalitarian government, Totalitarianism, video game company
Just a little curiosity here.
As the world changes, and definitely not for the better, I often find myself asking “what is the easiest way to restore stability?” Global warming caused by both citizens and corporations not giving a ****, people and companies like Bill Gates, Tim Horton’s, or Valve (the video game company) abusing the free markets for their explicit monopolization, so called activists intentionally attempting to trample on other peoples rights while crying about their own, and especially an economy which suffers a devastating recession approximately every seven to thirteen years. The list goes on and on.
Of course everybody says “we just need more freedom”, but do we really? I mean, the government never steps in to man handle the economy back together no matter how desperate the situation is because we are free to choose where we work, if we work at all. When all the major oligopolies were collapsing and entire cities worth of people were losing their jobs through no fault of their own our government refused to change the structure to adapt and survive. A totalitarian government, ideologically driven to perpetuate a stable economy, would go through great lengths to maintain civil order and economic growth… or at least stability. The police, always accused of brutality whenever the most minor of protests begins, are actually told NOT to attack groups such as the hells angels, scientology, and the KKK even though the entire planet knows they are guilty of all the most horrible crimes. The police could (and probably should) have just shot Carla Homolka but they didn’t.
But say a realistic and practical totalitarian political party with ideals based on what we hold dear in the present reality presents itself and somehow gathers enough power to actually do something. Would you be able to support them when they attempt fixing the economy by simply saying “inflation doesn’t exist” and they hard mark all prices at a fixed number (bread, for example, will forever cost $2.00). When they ship all the organized crime groups off to their secret prisons would you complain at all? How about when they force an employer to give you a job you wanted because everyone should have the right to employment. Would you side with them or defend the employers right to hire who he/she wishes?
Now I know everyone just defaults to hating totalitarianism and to explain why people feel that way would require a full essay of its own. But it has worked well in the past (and most of what we do know about cold war era ones is based on what our own media told us. Not that reliable of information is it?) Remember, one of the goals of totalitarianism is to attempt to enforce a preconceived idea of utopia. If this government were founded in, say, Canada, it is certain that they wouldn’t want freedom of association to disappear.
So I ask, if a totalitarian regime could present answers to our worlds problems would you be able to consider and maybe accept them?
No delusions of illogically and impractically random and omnipresent oppression please. This is a serious question asking for serious consideration. Yes we are all concerned about Big Brother but we all know how absurd that kind of depiction of totalitarianism is. It’s called fiction for a reason.
Posted in Affiliate Marketing 101
Posted on 30 August 2011. Tags: Belief, bill gates, Choice, conception, controversies, different thoughts, majority, mavericks, mediocrity, mid century, origin of species, plethora, religious community, research result, result
Please grade my SAT essay on a scale of 1 to 6 pts. and give me feedback and tips.
prompt:Do people succeed by emphasizing their differences from other people?
There are countless mavericks, in part, a plethora of them become successful icons, and a few of them just plow under. Emphasizing different thoughts from other people and proofing with stiff evidence is a prerequisite of becoming a famous figure. Bill Gates’ choice between education and business, Gandhi’s option among a mediocrity and a legendary ascetic-monk, Darwin selection between flowing with the regional conception and ignoring with majority, all prove that standing up and polarizing the world is a way to succeed.
When Bill Gates made his decision to drop put from Harvard, he did not care too much of the result. Gates entered Harvard in 1973, and dropped out two years later when he and Allen started the engine of Microsoft. Many people did not understand why Gates gave up such a good opportunity to study in world’s No.1 University. However, with size comes power, Microsoft dominates the pc market with its operating systems, such as MS-DOS and Windows. Now, Microsoft becomes the biggest software company in the world. The turning point in his life is the choice to leave the school to company. Although his seemingly crotchety behavior was unfathomable in that time, his harvest in business could likely to response it.
During prolific mid-century, the process of founding a new theory is also like emphasizing the difference. For example, when Darwin published his famous research result Origin of Species, the book encounter lots of controversies because majority of people believe that the theory of creating by God. Darwin’s friends tried to persuade him, but Darwin held his mind. The members of the religious community, as well as a lot of scientific peers, stubbornly held their belief that organism and each adaptation was the work of creator and were outraged about Darwin’s ideal and even some radical pedant tried to lawsuit Darwin. On the other hand, a few of insightful scientist tended to acknowledge Darwin’s researches. Eventually the theory of evolution defeated the traditional belief and totally changed the people’s conception towards the world. Now Darwin’s theory is reverenced as one of the greatest intellectual revolutions of human history. Because this different ideal from Darwin, because of the emerging of anti-mainstream’s voice, not only Darwin succeeds, but also all of human-beings succeed.
The secret of success is not so much disparate or peerless as pro-active—–even sometimes, their theory cannot be accepted by current society. To accept the main stream is evanescent, only standing out and showing your different suspect even groundless will leaving footprint.
I WROTE IT WITHIN 23 MIN.~
Posted in Affiliate Marketing 101