Affiliate Marketing Secrets

Fast food and junk food is a product of Capitalism and is the source of obesity and heart disease epidemic. We are still dependent on oil as corporations continue to keep out better alternatives (see Who Killed the Electric Car for one example). The rich keep getting richer, the middle class will all be on government aid in the next 20 years at the rate we are going. Media caters to viewers lust and greed.
We need a new economic system that is less dependent on the so called free-market.

Do the large lower classes own a bigger share of the pie than peasants did?
Do we have a bigger say in what gets done than medieval serfs?
Do the ruling class have to use more force to keepus down?

What distinguishes capitalism from socialism? Under each system, how are economic decisions made? Is one better than the other in terms of making ‘good’ decisions about the use of scarce resources? Explain.

The government has been interfering with the free market since the first great depression.
America=Crony Capitalism this is no secret.

By economic liberal, I should be more specific in that I mean economic liberals who identify as some sort of creative type who wants to be active in the market. In other words, an artists who wants to market oneself.
Now, as a traditionalist conservative, who identifies right on a number of issues, I’ve made it no secret that economically, I’m a card-carrying “East Coast Liberal” type; I believe in regulated capitalism with a reasonable safety net to safeguard the poor. But I am also a realist. I realise that the higher the tax rates are, the less activity there will be for the private sector. Is it possible for a non-laissez-fair economy to still achieve growth? You bet it is, history proves this. But because those of us who prize creativity want to present what we come up with to the market, it would seem that the liberal economy in some form could slow that down a bit.
Have they ever done any studies on how politics affect the entertainment/creative industries? Some claim that an artist who truely goes for his self interest should be libertarian. But I disagree, because Europe has always been more artsy than the US and coincidentally, has always been more economically tempered. Also, if such a statement was true, why do you suppose the VAST majority of creative types, are at least somewhat liberal?
I think this conflict is worth looking at. Discuss!

I thought privatized security was more efficient? Plus it doesn’t cost taxpayers money.
Does he hate the free market & capitalism? Socialist hypocrite.