Affiliate Marketing Secrets

India has a couple of Trillion dollars worth economy and hence a huge market for War Industry of which great USA is the biggest supplier and whose economy thrives on it. How about initiating a war between India and China? Both are hostile and have a territorial dispute already! India is sure to have then at least 50% of US produced ‘Weapons to Kill’, with no concession too. India has a huge Gold Reserve as well, being the biggest consumer of Gold. Even the ‘Fort Knox’ would seem a ‘Piggy Bank’ if India can be stripped off it’s last gold coin. So, if USA want to have humongous Gold reserves as crude oil as a currency valuation benchmark is no more in existent. Already China is emerging and want to be a World Power and world powers are required to do Military Adventures and on the other hand India is much weaker but still with a populace ruled by corrupt people and with huge ‘Gold’. The sheer amount of gold in India is mind boggling it roughly has 100 times more than what the reserves are within the hold of the government and the ‘Reserve Bank’. Recently in a Kerala Temple India, in it’s secret chamber 5 out of six the amount was found stood at $ 23 Billion most of it being in Gold and Diamonds. Indians in a state of war would give and empty their gold deposits at willingly to carry on the conflict too! So, this should be a great profitable game for US, if it can do so. Dollar would be much more stronger than ever before if it can make this happen!

Before you begin, I want to let you know this is a serious topic. This is for some trivia for economic majors. Please keep in mind you should have some economic background before you read this. If you want to give it a try then read everything slowly and thoroughly. PLEASE don’t leave any response as “too long I didn’t read everything blablabla”, sorry about my grammar.
I know the saying that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and it caught my attention that I know how the rich can’t spend all their savings amassed from corporation business, even if they are taxed certain percentage of their earnings to help poor people get by.
I know simple economic models help demonstrate the problem. Let me know if I am wrong. For simplicity we will start without a government.
Example 1.
Let’s say in the economy there is only 2 dollars, and there are 2 people and each have 1 dollar.
Person A has the secret trade to grow apples but needs land. Person B has the land and housing acquired through inherency. Thus person A pays 1 dollar for the use of his land to grow unlimited apple as well sleep in it shared by person B. Person B in return pays 1 dollar to eat his apple. Thus the money velocity is 1. No one is in debt. No wealth is gained.
Example 2.
Let’s say there are 3 people now. And there is 3 dollar in the economy and each have 1 dollar. Person C is a low IQ laborer, and because he has 1 dollar to spend he will always be broke (in debt) after spending that 1 dollar on either housing or food. Either way Person C is screwed.
Example 3.
Let’s say there are 4 people now, and each have 25 dollar. So there is (25×4) 100 dollar in the economy. Person A still pays 1 dollar for land and sells apple at 1 dollar each, and Person B still charges 1 dollar per person for housing. However Person C and D are willing to work to provide for food and housing, and also demands higher wages. Even If Person C and D work for labor at 1 dollar, they can only pay for either food or shelter. Because of Market theory that as there is more demand, price will rise, therefore there’s an incentive for “A” to sell apple at a higher price let’s say 2 dollar. Because of our desire to survive, C and D will demand higher wages, and then “A” demands even higher prices to compensate for the labor. Person B is fine as long as he can feed himself. This vicious cycle continues. Therefore Person A and B will always amass wealth while Person C and D therefore be spending from their savings until they are broke, meaning they will always be poor.
Example 4.
Let’s say there are 5 people now. Each have 20 dollar. So there is (20×5) 100 dollar in the economy. Because Person C and D are broke. There is an incentive for them to steal. ONLY when the stealing starts, Person A hires person E to work as a police man to safeguard the asset paying him 2 dollar, minimum sustainment. Thus Person A and B will always accumulate wealth, Person C and D will suffer the same faith of poverty. Person E will neither go up or down the wealth ladder.
Example 5.
Let’s say there are is still 6 primary people and 100 other people who are Low IQ laborer, who will still suffer the same faith of Person C and D, just in the matter of moment. The money supply is a lot more now, almost uncountable Person F sees that the world is unjustified and therefore revolt and later a government is form. Person F is a government official and requires the merchant to pay taxes to compensate for the housing, therefore Laborers are only working for food 1 dollar labor for 1 dollar apple, while Person B is also taxed from housing to supply better jobs at better wage to build railroad, sewers, buildings, schools. Keep in mind that not government cannot compensate everyone, therefore some will always be unemployment and broke. While some Low IQ laborers are lucky to acquire free education to get the better paying jobs. Person F is in the safe zone of being a government official.
For now keep in mind there is no bank for money multiplier, bank ratio, money printing, etc. Even if there is, it does not affect the poor people, even if they have savings, the interest is miniscule. Person A will still have more interest base on his large Capital acquired from all the people who used up their savings. There is no longer equality.

Before you begin, I want to let you know this is a serious topic. This is for some trivia for economic majors. Please keep in mind you should have some economic background before you read this. If you want to give it a try then read everything slowly and thoroughly. PLEASE don’t leave any response as “too long I didn’t read everything blablabla”, sorry about my grammar
I know the saying that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and it caught my attention that I know how the rich can’t spend all their savings amassed from corporation business, even if they are taxed certain percentage of their earnings to help poor people get by.
I know the saying that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and it caught my attention that I know how the rich can’t spend all their savings amassed from corporation business, even if they are taxed certain percentage of their earnings to help poor people get by.
I know simple economic models help demonstrate the problem. Let me know if I am wrong. For simplicity we will start without a government.
Example 1.
Let’s say in the economy there is only 2 dollars, and there are 2 people and each have 1 dollar.
Person A has the secret trade to grow apples but needs land. Person B has the land and housing acquired through inherency. Thus person A pays 1 dollar for the use of his land to grow unlimited apple as well sleep in it shared by person B. Person B in return pays 1 dollar to eat his apple. Thus the money velocity is 1. No one is in debt. No wealth is gained.
Example 2.
Let’s say there are 3 people now. And there is 3 dollar in the economy and each have 1 dollar. Person C is a low IQ laborer, and because he has 1 dollar to spend he will always be broke (in debt) after spending that 1 dollar on either housing or food. Either way Person C is screwed.
Example 3.
Let’s say there are 4 people now, and each have 25 dollar. So there is (25×4) 100 dollar in the economy. Person A still pays 1 dollar for land and sells apple at 1 dollar each, and Person B still charges 1 dollar per person for housing. However Person C and D are willing to work to provide for food and housing, and also demands higher wages. Even If Person C and D work for labor at 1 dollar, they can only pay for either food or shelter. Because of Market theory that as there is more demand, price will rise, therefore there’s an incentive for “A” to sell apple at a higher price let’s say 2 dollar. Because of our desire to survive, C and D will demand higher wages, and then “A” demands even higher prices to compensate for the labor. Person B is fine as long as he can feed himself. This vicious cycle continues. Therefore Person A and B will always amass wealth while Person C and D therefore be spending from their savings until they are broke, meaning they will always be poor.
Example 4.
Let’s say there are 5 people now. Each have 20 dollar. So there is (20×5) 100 dollar in the economy. Because Person C and D are broke. There is an incentive for them to steal. ONLY when the stealing starts, Person A hires person E to work as a police man to safeguard the asset paying him 2 dollar, minimum sustainment. Thus Person A and B will always accumulate wealth, Person C and D will suffer the same faith of poverty. Person E will neither go up or down the wealth ladder.
Example 5.
Let’s say there are is still 6 primary people and 100 other people who are Low IQ laborer, who will still suffer the same faith of Person C and D, just in the matter of moment. The money supply is a lot more now, almost uncountable Person F sees that the world is unjustified and therefore revolt and later a government is form. Person F is a government official and requires the merchant to pay taxes to compensate for the housing, therefore Laborers are only working for food 1 dollar labor for 1 dollar apple, while Person B is also taxed from housing to supply better jobs at better wage to build railroad, sewers, buildings, schools. Keep in mind that not government cannot compensate everyone, therefore some will always be unemployment and broke. While some Low IQ laborers are lucky to acquire free education to get the better paying jobs. Person F is in the safe zone of being a government official.
For now keep in mind there is no bank for money multiplier, bank ratio, money printing, etc. Even if there is, it does not affect the poor people, even if they have savings, the interest is miniscule. Person A will still have more interest base on his large Capital acquired from all the people who used up their savings. There is no longer equality.

Hope and Change?? guy obviously had no idea what he was getting into, running as president…acting like Bush could have changed or made things better….Obama thought it was 100x easier than it looks..and now the Republicans and Conservatives can just sit back with their feet up and laugh as this president scrambles all around and tries everything he can to fix the economy, while unemployment rises. I’m no right-winger or left-winger…times like these are the times where I am thankful I am in the middle and am not ‘name’ affiliated to a party or direction
I hated George W Bush as president, but in all honesty, when you look at the big picture, we aren’t much better off with Barack Obama

I ask this because I am a super motivated individual who isn’t willing to settle for the casual 9-5 or doesn’t want to acquire wealth through retirement…So many people say the key to get rich is to save, invest or get a 6figure job…all of which takes a considerable amount of time…(I don’t want to be old and just starting to enjoy life, but while I am young and can appreciate it more)…
I want to know from people who are wealthy themselves or who are rich…Obviously, rich/wealthy people are financially educated and thus think differently, have different social crowds and know how to protect themselves when it comes to making $$$…in today’s economy, I would want to know what fields should I look into, what connections or people should I get acquainted with…what tools and resources I would need…I am a 24year old black male from NYC and would like to be financially independent before I hit 30…its not impossible (I have met tons of people in NYC who are in their youth with long pockets so I know its possible)…please only respond if you are going to shed some serious light…
I have read books (Rich Dad Poor Dad, attended seminars and read PDF’s) and even started my own PC Repair Business (which has failed misearbly)…I guess what I am asking is on the road to wealth, is it better to start a business, invest or maybe try another avenue (most common folk) would not normally try or know to exist…?
Side Note*, it seems everyday a new music artist is born, sports player is signed, a doctor is made (and their all wealthy)etc…there is so much wealth in this country and only the top 1% have access to it, I just want to find my niche and get a piece of that…Thanks for your time and for reading this…

Watch The end Game documentary on youtube.com and some videos of Gerald Celenta. What do you think of the depression coming because of our Gov? What is you view on our economy now? Is this a great time to invest in the stock Market? Should I withdraw my ROTH IRA and just save money in CDs?