Affiliate Marketing Secrets

His retirement home will be ready January 2013. Interesting huh?
“Are Obama insiders secretly making retirement plans for the Obamas with the expectation the president will lose his bid for re-election in November?”
“Very quietly, Obama’s chief financier, Penny Pritzker, has entered the Hawaii housing market to buy a retirement home for the president and his family that will be available not in 2016, but in January 2013, according to a confidential source within Pritzker’s Chicago organization”
Read:http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/secret-retire…

BURIED in the OBAMACARE bill is a HIDDEN FEDERAL TAX that will be applied to any HOMEOWNER when they SELL there HOME. The funds collected will be used to help fund OBAMACARE. Remember Nancy Pelosi’s famous words ” They’ll just have to wait and see whats in the bill after we pass it.” Well this is ONE thing amaong many people wont like Im willing to bet. If you own a HOME who will you be vote for in November 2012?
1) OBAMA
OR
2) ROMNEY
****TELL YOUR FRIENDS,FAMILY AND NEIGHBORS ABOUT THIS HIDDEN TAX IN OBAMACARE BECAUSE THIS HIDDEN TAX COULD FURTHER AFFECT THE STRUGGLING HOUSING MARKETS AND HINDER HOME SALE ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY.

It is no secret that Harper has basically given the finger to every true conservative in this country.
Why?
1. The size of government and the house of commons has increased.
2. He won’t push to defund the CBC.
3. He has and continues to silence pro life mps in his own party. And pretty much any REAL conservative that speaks up with an opposing viewpoint to him.
4. Government spending is up.
5. He won’t allow FREE market by allowing foreign companies to add more competition in the telecommunication sector.
6. He is funding international planned parenthood!
7. He broke his balanced budget promise.
8. He used tax dollars for the useless Libya mission.
This just to name a few. With such an anti conservative agenda, how does he expect to get any votes in the next election!? He has smeared this party and I hope he goes down as one of the biggest failures in Canadian politics!!

Olbermann was the ring-leader of the disastrous,dead-last-in-the-ratings debacle (sort of like “The View” without an Elizabeth Hasselbeck to at least provide a beauty among the beasts) that virtually destroyed any remaining suspicions that MSNBC might be loosely affiliated with a legitimate news organization. Amidst the ongoing nervousness about the new “Lean Forward” punch-line at MSNBC (which NBC insiders have admitted is a risky admission that one’s brand identity no longer has anything to do with real journalism), it is obvious that Olbermann didn’t get fired because the minor donations suddenly jeopardized his “impartiality”. And the fact that the suspension-without-pay has no time limit on it leaves one to wonder if this is part of Comcast’s transition strategy. Or is it Phil Griffin’s way to remind Olbermann and others that he really is the President and calls the shots? WHAT DO YOU THINK? WHAT IS THE REAL REASON BEHIND THE SUSPENSION?

A key liberal group and Vice President Biden renewed unsubstantiated charges Monday that foreign money is bankrolling political activity to support Republicans in the crucial midterm elections.
The latest broadsides came on two fronts. MoveOn.org Political Action released a new ad attacking Illinois Republican Senate nominee Mark Kirk for his ties to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and claiming it receives funds from Chinese and Russian companies that “threaten American jobs.” Biden, meanwhile, repeated an assertion first made by President Obama that some of the vast sums flowing to independent groups for ads might come from “foreign sources.” Neither offered proof that foreign money is paying for ads.
The chamber, which has pledged to pump $75 million into the congressional elections, adamantly denies it has used any dues from foreign affiliates for politics. Bruce Josten, the chamber’s top lobbyist, called the charges an attempt to “demonize specific groups” and “distract Americans from a failed economic agenda.”
It is illegal for foreign companies to contribute directly to American political campaigns.
Campaign-finance experts, however, say it is impossible to verify Democrats’ claims of foreign involvement in campaigns because federal law does not require non-profits, such as the chamber, to publicly disclose their sources of funding or certify that overseas contributions do not pay for ads.
“Are foreign companies involving themselves in the current election? The answer largely is: Who knows?” said Dave Levinthal of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign money.
“Both sides are being somewhat disingenuous,” he said. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and other groups allied with the party have presented no proof of their allegations. Meanwhile, Levinthal said, conservative groups “aren’t exactly rushing to volunteer information.”
The controversy has erupted as Democrats face a flood of outside spending benefiting Republican candidates in the sprint to Election Day. Between Sept. 1 and Oct. 6, conservative organizations such as American Crossroads, spent nearly $26 million on political activity that calls for the election and defeat of specific congressional candidates, according to the center’s tally. That’s more than four times the amount spent by liberal groups, such as Defenders of Wildlife, during the same period.
The new spending is spurred, in part, by a Supreme Court ruling last January that opened the door to unlimited corporate money for ads that specifically target candidates.
Republicans “are being incredibly aggressive and for good reason,” Levinthal said. “There’s the very real opportunity that they could win back the House, and perhaps have an outside chance at the Senate,” he said.
The Republicans need a net gain of 39 seats in the House of Representatives and 10 in the Senate to take control of Congress.
MoveOn spokeswoman Ilyse Hogue defended the anti-Kirk ad, which it plans to air in Chicago and central Illinois. She said the burden is on the chamber to prove it is not funneling foreign money to politics. “The chamber could put this all to rest so easily … by simply allowing an independent audit.” Kirk spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski called MoveOn “an extreme liberal group” that is out of sync with “mainstream Illinois voters.”
In recent days, Obama has argued foreign money was funding conservative campaign ads, without naming the Chamber of Commerce.
Others with close ties to the president have been more direct. A DNC ad, for instance, said the chamber “shills for big business” and appears to take “secret foreign money to influence our elections.”
On Monday, Biden hit on the theme again during a campaign swing through Pennsylvania. “It bothers me, all these unattributed contributions,” he said during a speech outside Scranton. “Where is all this money from?”
Obama first raised the specter of foreign funds flowing into U.S. elections during his State of the Union Address this year, in which he lambasted the Supreme Court’s decision. In recent months, Senate Republicans have blocked consideration of Democratic legislation that would require new disclosure in political advertising, including mandating that CEOs appear in ads they helped fund.
Allegations of campaign-finance irregularities are unlikely to resonate with most voters unless there’s clear proof of illegal activity, said Gary Jacobson, a political scientist at University of California-San Diego. “What people care about is the economy,” he said. “This is a sideshow.”