Posted on 25 July 2011. Tags: check, cia director george, director george tenet, george tenet, government of libya, Islamic, islamic caliphate, islamic extremists, islamic scholars, jihad, libyan leader muammar, LIFG, muammar gaddafi, senate intelligence committee, testimony
How would Americans feel if they knew the Obama administration just agreed to hand people affiliated with a designated terrorist group a $30 billion dollar check and recognize them as the legitimate rulers of Libya?
Things weren’t looking so good for the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group back in 2004 when they were designated a foreign terrorist group by the State Department. In chilling testimony, then-CIA Director George Tenet warned the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2004 that even if Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda was completely destroyed, “a global network of Islamic extremists bent on killing Americans had emerged.” Tenet listed the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) as one of those groups.
In 2007, the LIFG formally joined al-Qaeda, an event so well documented that even Reuters covered it. Its goals, which it is now close to achieving thanks to airpower help from President Obama and NATO, include killing Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, setting up an Islamic caliphate in Libya and waging international jihad.
The known leaders of the Libyan rebel forces on the ground are all former LIFG fighters, some with documented personal connections to al-Qaeda. The Transitional National Council, which the Obama administration recognized last week as the official government of Libya, is packed with pro-LIFG activists, lawyers who have advocated for imprisoned LIFG fighters, and Islamic scholars from LIFG strongholds.
Something smells strongly of jihad here. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?i…
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 22 November 2010. Tags: Answer, Armed, asker, British, Celtic, celtic fans, dear readers, great war, Held, heroic efforts, heroism, hm forces, islamic extremists, world peace, yahoo answers
I, personally, hate it when people don’t ask the question in the “question” box, here I am though – doing it myself!
The only reason being that this one requires some background.
Essentially, a Celtic fanatic asked a question about another Celtic fanatic (according to the asker) pondering whether or not we all loved the alleged fanatic because of his benevolent behaviour.
As I read this question several days after reading about Celtic fans waving banners similar to those waved by Islamic extremists when confronted with HM Forces heroism, I responded negatively:
“Probably trying (desperately) to get some credibility and public support for Celtic fans? Big Fail!! Reject the Poppy and give up your human rights in this country, scum.”
This answer got deleted.
I have appealed to YA, with this:
“By deleting my answer – you accept that every member of the British Armed Forces that died, didn’t die for a cause or reason. You relish the deaths of members of the British Armed Forces. You believe that people should be allowed to be affiliated with organisations which denounce Britain’s heroic efforts in attempting to crush tyranny, free people from oppression and ultimately achieve World Peace. And that those people and their supporters should have a louder voice than those people who support our lads and Britain’s efforts?
Politics aside, we are talking about the war dead. Since the beginning of the Great War in 1914.
Should the war dead be hated or sainted?
You decide, Yahoo Answers.”
Ultimately my question, dear readers, is – Am I right for respecting our war dead, or is Yahoo right for supporting anti-British sentiment?
There will be an update to this one, I promise!
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 22 November 2010. Tags: Answer, Armed, asker, British, Celtic, celtic fans, dear readers, great war, Held, heroic efforts, heroism, hm forces, islamic extremists, world peace, yahoo answers
I, personally, hate it when people don’t ask the question in the “question” box, here I am though – doing it myself!
The only reason being that this one requires some background.
Essentially, a Celtic fanatic asked a question about another Celtic fanatic (according to the asker) pondering whether or not we all loved the alleged fanatic because of his benevolent behaviour.
As I read this question several days after reading about Celtic fans waving banners similar to those waved by Islamic extremists when confronted with HM Forces heroism, I responded negatively:
“Probably trying (desperately) to get some credibility and public support for Celtic fans? Big Fail!! Reject the Poppy and give up your human rights in this country, scum.”
This answer got deleted.
I have appealed to YA, with this:
“By deleting my answer – you accept that every member of the British Armed Forces that died, didn’t die for a cause or reason. You relish the deaths of members of the British Armed Forces. You believe that people should be allowed to be affiliated with organisations which denounce Britain’s heroic efforts in attempting to crush tyranny, free people from oppression and ultimately achieve World Peace. And that those people and their supporters should have a louder voice than those people who support our lads and Britain’s efforts?
Politics aside, we are talking about the war dead. Since the beginning of the Great War in 1914.
Should the war dead be hated or sainted?
You decide, Yahoo Answers.”
Ultimately my question, dear readers, is – Am I right for respecting our war dead, or is Yahoo right for supporting anti-British sentiment?
There will be an update to this one, I promise!
Posted in Featured Articles