Affiliate Marketing Secrets

Open QuestionShow me another »
History Study Guide Help!! :)?
1. What event required European nations to inform others when claiming a new African territory?
A. Berlin Conference * myanswer
B. Indian National Congress
C. Bloody Sunday
D. Missouri Compromise
2.Which of the following events occurred in Russia and led to the establishment of the October Manifesto, which promised more rights to Russians?
A. Hundreds of protesters were shot after Father Gapon led them to the Winter Palace to demand reform; this was known as Bloody Sunday.
B. Alexander II freed serfs and gave them land in hopes of developing a market economy.
C. Jews were attacked, being blamed for the assassination of Alexander II
D. A secret society known as the Decembrists led a revolt against Nicholas I
3.What nation did Otto von Bismarck unite in the late 1800s after wars with Austria and France?
A. Italy
B. France
C. Russia
D. Germany * my answer
4.Identify the two key figures who led movements in South America’s struggle for independence from Spain.
A. Toussaint L’Ouverture and Napoleon
B. Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín * my answer
C. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams
D. Otto von Bismarck and Camillo di Cavour
5. Which of the following is NOT true about the issues that led to civil war in the United States?
A. Conflict arose between the northern and southern parts of the United States.
B. The North was more advanced commercially and they were expanding industrially.
C. The South wanted to abolish slavery in order to hire laborers to work the plantations.
D. The South wanted new territories that were being admitted into the United States to be slave state
6.In what nation did former slave Toussaint L’Ouverture lead a revolt against French forces?
A. Venezuela
B. Haiti
C. United States
D. Italy
7.Identify the nation that exerted imperial control over India, impacting its language and religious beliefs.
A. China
B. Germany
C. Britain
D. Argentina
8. What term refers to the concept of forcefully extending a nation’s authority over weaker nations for purpose of acquiring land or natural resources for their own benefit?
A. industrialization
B. imperialism
C. capitalism
D. revolution
9.Who traveled to Japan in 1852, setting up two trading posts and opening the country to trade with the West?
A. Otto von Bismarck * my answer
B. Simón Bolívar
C. Thomas Jefferson
D. Matthew Perry

Which of the following events occurred in Russia and led to the establishment of the October Manifesto, which promised more rights to Russians?
A. Hundreds of protesters were shot after Father Gapon led them to the Winter Palace to demand reform; this was known as Bloody Sunday.
B. Alexander II freed serfs and gave them land in hopes of developing a market economy.
C. Jews were attacked, being blamed for the assassination of Alexander II
D. A secret society known as the Decembrists led a revolt against Nicholas I.

Before you begin, I want to let you know this is a serious topic. This is for some trivia for economic majors. Please keep in mind you should have some economic background before you read this. If you want to give it a try then read everything slowly and thoroughly. PLEASE don’t leave any response as “too long I didn’t read everything blablabla”, sorry about my grammar.
I know the saying that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and it caught my attention that I know how the rich can’t spend all their savings amassed from corporation business, even if they are taxed certain percentage of their earnings to help poor people get by.
I know simple economic models help demonstrate the problem. Let me know if I am wrong. For simplicity we will start without a government.
Example 1.
Let’s say in the economy there is only 2 dollars, and there are 2 people and each have 1 dollar.
Person A has the secret trade to grow apples but needs land. Person B has the land and housing acquired through inherency. Thus person A pays 1 dollar for the use of his land to grow unlimited apple as well sleep in it shared by person B. Person B in return pays 1 dollar to eat his apple. Thus the money velocity is 1. No one is in debt. No wealth is gained.
Example 2.
Let’s say there are 3 people now. And there is 3 dollar in the economy and each have 1 dollar. Person C is a low IQ laborer, and because he has 1 dollar to spend he will always be broke (in debt) after spending that 1 dollar on either housing or food. Either way Person C is screwed.
Example 3.
Let’s say there are 4 people now, and each have 25 dollar. So there is (25×4) 100 dollar in the economy. Person A still pays 1 dollar for land and sells apple at 1 dollar each, and Person B still charges 1 dollar per person for housing. However Person C and D are willing to work to provide for food and housing, and also demands higher wages. Even If Person C and D work for labor at 1 dollar, they can only pay for either food or shelter. Because of Market theory that as there is more demand, price will rise, therefore there’s an incentive for “A” to sell apple at a higher price let’s say 2 dollar. Because of our desire to survive, C and D will demand higher wages, and then “A” demands even higher prices to compensate for the labor. Person B is fine as long as he can feed himself. This vicious cycle continues. Therefore Person A and B will always amass wealth while Person C and D therefore be spending from their savings until they are broke, meaning they will always be poor.
Example 4.
Let’s say there are 5 people now. Each have 20 dollar. So there is (20×5) 100 dollar in the economy. Because Person C and D are broke. There is an incentive for them to steal. ONLY when the stealing starts, Person A hires person E to work as a police man to safeguard the asset paying him 2 dollar, minimum sustainment. Thus Person A and B will always accumulate wealth, Person C and D will suffer the same faith of poverty. Person E will neither go up or down the wealth ladder.
Example 5.
Let’s say there are is still 6 primary people and 100 other people who are Low IQ laborer, who will still suffer the same faith of Person C and D, just in the matter of moment. The money supply is a lot more now, almost uncountable Person F sees that the world is unjustified and therefore revolt and later a government is form. Person F is a government official and requires the merchant to pay taxes to compensate for the housing, therefore Laborers are only working for food 1 dollar labor for 1 dollar apple, while Person B is also taxed from housing to supply better jobs at better wage to build railroad, sewers, buildings, schools. Keep in mind that not government cannot compensate everyone, therefore some will always be unemployment and broke. While some Low IQ laborers are lucky to acquire free education to get the better paying jobs. Person F is in the safe zone of being a government official.
For now keep in mind there is no bank for money multiplier, bank ratio, money printing, etc. Even if there is, it does not affect the poor people, even if they have savings, the interest is miniscule. Person A will still have more interest base on his large Capital acquired from all the people who used up their savings. There is no longer equality.

Before you begin, I want to let you know this is a serious topic. This is for some trivia for economic majors. Please keep in mind you should have some economic background before you read this. If you want to give it a try then read everything slowly and thoroughly. PLEASE don’t leave any response as “too long I didn’t read everything blablabla”, sorry about my grammar
I know the saying that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and it caught my attention that I know how the rich can’t spend all their savings amassed from corporation business, even if they are taxed certain percentage of their earnings to help poor people get by.
I know the saying that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and it caught my attention that I know how the rich can’t spend all their savings amassed from corporation business, even if they are taxed certain percentage of their earnings to help poor people get by.
I know simple economic models help demonstrate the problem. Let me know if I am wrong. For simplicity we will start without a government.
Example 1.
Let’s say in the economy there is only 2 dollars, and there are 2 people and each have 1 dollar.
Person A has the secret trade to grow apples but needs land. Person B has the land and housing acquired through inherency. Thus person A pays 1 dollar for the use of his land to grow unlimited apple as well sleep in it shared by person B. Person B in return pays 1 dollar to eat his apple. Thus the money velocity is 1. No one is in debt. No wealth is gained.
Example 2.
Let’s say there are 3 people now. And there is 3 dollar in the economy and each have 1 dollar. Person C is a low IQ laborer, and because he has 1 dollar to spend he will always be broke (in debt) after spending that 1 dollar on either housing or food. Either way Person C is screwed.
Example 3.
Let’s say there are 4 people now, and each have 25 dollar. So there is (25×4) 100 dollar in the economy. Person A still pays 1 dollar for land and sells apple at 1 dollar each, and Person B still charges 1 dollar per person for housing. However Person C and D are willing to work to provide for food and housing, and also demands higher wages. Even If Person C and D work for labor at 1 dollar, they can only pay for either food or shelter. Because of Market theory that as there is more demand, price will rise, therefore there’s an incentive for “A” to sell apple at a higher price let’s say 2 dollar. Because of our desire to survive, C and D will demand higher wages, and then “A” demands even higher prices to compensate for the labor. Person B is fine as long as he can feed himself. This vicious cycle continues. Therefore Person A and B will always amass wealth while Person C and D therefore be spending from their savings until they are broke, meaning they will always be poor.
Example 4.
Let’s say there are 5 people now. Each have 20 dollar. So there is (20×5) 100 dollar in the economy. Because Person C and D are broke. There is an incentive for them to steal. ONLY when the stealing starts, Person A hires person E to work as a police man to safeguard the asset paying him 2 dollar, minimum sustainment. Thus Person A and B will always accumulate wealth, Person C and D will suffer the same faith of poverty. Person E will neither go up or down the wealth ladder.
Example 5.
Let’s say there are is still 6 primary people and 100 other people who are Low IQ laborer, who will still suffer the same faith of Person C and D, just in the matter of moment. The money supply is a lot more now, almost uncountable Person F sees that the world is unjustified and therefore revolt and later a government is form. Person F is a government official and requires the merchant to pay taxes to compensate for the housing, therefore Laborers are only working for food 1 dollar labor for 1 dollar apple, while Person B is also taxed from housing to supply better jobs at better wage to build railroad, sewers, buildings, schools. Keep in mind that not government cannot compensate everyone, therefore some will always be unemployment and broke. While some Low IQ laborers are lucky to acquire free education to get the better paying jobs. Person F is in the safe zone of being a government official.
For now keep in mind there is no bank for money multiplier, bank ratio, money printing, etc. Even if there is, it does not affect the poor people, even if they have savings, the interest is miniscule. Person A will still have more interest base on his large Capital acquired from all the people who used up their savings. There is no longer equality.

I used to think that communism was the worst kind of government, but in America, land of innovation, we have come up with something, much worse; Secret Government!
At least the communists have in mind to set up something they erroneously think will work
Those who operate a secret government have no interest in a successful system of government
All they want is power, money and control and they don’t care if it takes down our entire species, as long as they can enjoy material wealth
They’d send your kids into a war, based on nothing, just control of poppy fields, so they can corner the heroin market and make a killing of the addictive drug that is sold to our kids
These people are so rotten that they would sell out their country, sell out their species, sell us all down the river, for a few bucks and a little pleasure
They are the kind of people who hire hookers, overeat and rape children
They are lawless parasites
At least the communists are hoping for a better life for everyone!
So, what do you think? Do you like what we have or do you prefer communism?

I used to think that communism was the worst kind of government, but in America, land of innovation, we have come up with something, much worse; Secret Government!
At least the communists have in mind to set up something they erroneously think will work
Those who operate a secret government have no interest in a successful system of government
All they want is power, money and control and they don’t care if it takes down our entire species, as long as they can enjoy material wealth
They’d send your kids into a war, based on nothing, just control of poppy fields, so they can corner the heroin market and make a killing of the addictive drug that is sold to our kids
These people are so rotten that they would sell out their country, sell out their species, sell us all down the river, for a few bucks and a little pleasure
They are the kind of people who hire hookers, overeat and rape children
They are lawless parasites
At least the communists are hoping for a better life for everyone!
So, what do you think? Do you like what we have or do you prefer communism?