Affiliate Marketing Secrets

On Wednesday, I received a job offer from a law firm that practices exactly the niche area of law I’m interested in so I was very excited about the offer – they wanted me to start next week. I called them back yesterday to discuss the details of the offer and to accept the offer. I was informed that they would like to move the start date back a few weeks to late-January/early-February but they didn’t have an exact date at this time. I accepted the offer under those terms and asked that they send me written confirmation of everything we discussed with the precise start date. Should I wait until I receive their letter prior to sending my letter/email essentially providing written confirmation of my acceptance of the offer?

On Wednesday, I received a job offer from a law firm that practices exactly the niche area of law I’m interested in so I was very excited about the offer – they wanted me to start next week. I called them back today to discuss the details of the offer and to accept the offer. I was informed that they would like to move the start date back a few weeks to late-January/early-February but they didn’t have an exact date at this time. I accepted the offer under those terms and asked that they send me written confirmation of everything we discussed with the precise start date. Should I wait until I receive their letter prior to sending my letter/email essentially providing written confirmation of my acceptance of the offer?

in either domestic and/or military law?
While military custody may be appropriate; indefinite imprisonment is problematic.
“In its veto threat, the White House said it cannot accept any legislation that “challenges or constrains the president’s authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists and protect the nation.” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and FBI Director Robert Mueller have opposed the provisions.
Republicans counter that their efforts are necessary to respond to an evolving, post-Sept. 11 threat, and that Obama has failed to produce a consistent policy on handling terror suspects.
The bill would require military custody of a suspect deemed to be a member of al-Qaida or its affiliates and involved in plotting or committing attacks on the United States. American citizens would be exempt. The bill does allow the executive branch to waive the authority based on national security and hold a suspect in civilian custody….”
It is appropriate to set clear timelines considering charges.http://news.yahoo.com/senate-backs-milit…

Profile/biodata for knowledge of electors/voters@us pres elec nov 12 is essential?us news media?cand*below?K?
the rev dr kamal karna royaka j g jr, cand pres elec nov 2012, writein@all usa
education has an M B A DEGREE (m s IN SPECIALISATION IN tRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FROM suny MARITIME COLLEGE , the BRONX, NEW YORK CITY, usa ; STUDIED ADVANCED COURSE LEADING T ADVANCED CERT. IN pUBLIC ADMN. FROM usda gRADUATE SCHOOL, WASHINTON dc ( SCHOOL id :578- 80- 4399 ;
he has 2 Doctoral degrees in management science in fields of management Science and another in field/faculty of Religions / god/s/people from foreign school He has a bachelor’s degree in law from foreign cchool of laws and management. He further took in education s in University of Rhode Island,both at Providence and Kingston , in usa and other schools viz City university of new York,Baruch college, New york city, usa et al
employer volunteer ordained clergy with vow of poverty ( U S IRS rule for ordained clergies in USA .group Handicap interests international world religions group. 107 A Scribner avenue, staten Island , New york city, n y 10301, USA
occupation activist, mobile clergy, electronic preacher of multiple or unique god/s and religions , et al.
title mobile clergy,Political activist USA and around globe; currently he is a u s presidential hopeful / candidate for 2008 electoral competition from Republican Party in New York ; strategist for common / weaker people, disadvantaged people in democracy in usa et al to claim leadership including the 2008 Presidency electoral competition: the weaker people aresegregated and removed from electoral race by stategic powerful block in democracy in U S republic including the news media and news conglomerates. see court actions pending in the main article of Dr kamal Karna Roy.strategist of god/s , religions, people, et al, activist
salary
networth
height = 5′ 8′
weight
term
predecessor
successor
party Republican ( GOP)of usa
boards
religion world religions/ multiple religions in unique body and soul and a proponent of the strategy.
spouse a common law wife
partner
children some, maintained by natural mother concerned
parents
relatives
signature
website
footnotes
Kamal Karna the early 1990s, has filed numerous lawsuits throughout the United States and its territories under the names Roy and Joseph Geronimo, Jr., as well as under the names of entities that he is affiliated with, including International Siva Consciousness & World Religions, Reforms International, Handicap Interests International, and Jungle Democracy.Jungle Democracy v. U.S., No. CIV.06-503-SLR, 2006 WL 2616213, at *1 (D. Del. Sept. 12, 2006) Roy’s lawsuits are often brought against multiple defendants, and feature long, unconventional complaints. Roy has filed lawsuits against God, U.S. Presidents, Supreme Court Justices, fast food restaurants, foreign leaders. Roy v. U.S., No. CIV.06-685-SLR 2007 WL 1109296 at *1 (D. Del. Apr. 11, 2007), and Wikipedia http://dockets.justia.com/browse/state-new_hampshire/court-nhdce/noscat-5/ http://www.area603.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=1460&blogId=6 .
Roy’s lawsuits have addressed, among many other things, actions taken by President George W. Bush, overcharging by telecommunication companies, the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts to the Supreme Court, and “failure of democratic societies and God’s role therein.”Id. In 2006 Judge Michael W. McConnell of The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit described a typical Roy complaint:
Roy, a/k/a Joseph Geronimo, Jr. filed a 115-page complaint, a 144-page amended complaint, and a 40-page second amended complaint against over sixty defendants, including among many others President Bush, God as U.S.-based divine benefactor, several government agencies, The New York Times, and Kentucky Fried Chicken. In addition to pages of rambling discourse, the complaint contains numerous illegible handwritten remarks.Jungle Democracy v. USA Government at Washington, DC & at Denver, 206 Fed.Appx. 756 (C.A.10, 2006)
The Tenth Circuit went on to affirm the district court’s dismissal of the complaint holding that no discernible claim was apparent from the complaint. Judge McConnell also humorously noted that the court “strongly suspected at least one defendant was not properly served.”Id. at 757
Most, if not all, of Roy’s complaints have been dismissed. A 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware opinion, Jungle Democracy v. U.S., describes Roy as “no stranger to litigation” and provides a partial list of Roy lawsuits that have been dismissed since 1991.Jungle Democracy, 2006 WL 2616213, at *1
Despite Roy’s lack of success in the courts, his lawsuits have been discussed in law school classrooms and in law related blogs. http://howappealing.law.com/112106.html#019767 http://enmasse.ca/forums/vi

Profile/biodata for knowledge of electors/voters@us pres elec nov 12 is essential?us news media?cand*below?K?
the rev dr kamal karna royaka j g jr, cand pres elec nov 2012, writein@all usa
education has an M B A DEGREE (m s IN SPECIALISATION IN tRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FROM suny MARITIME COLLEGE , the BRONX, NEW YORK CITY, usa ; STUDIED ADVANCED COURSE LEADING T ADVANCED CERT. IN pUBLIC ADMN. FROM usda gRADUATE SCHOOL, WASHINTON dc ( SCHOOL id :578- 80- 4399 ;
he has 2 Doctoral degrees in management science in fields of management Science and another in field/faculty of Religions / god/s/people from foreign school He has a bachelor’s degree in law from foreign cchool of laws and management. He further took in education s in University of Rhode Island,both at Providence and Kingston , in usa and other schools viz City university of new York,Baruch college, New york city, usa et al
employer volunteer ordained clergy with vow of poverty ( U S IRS rule for ordained clergies in USA .group Handicap interests international world religions group. 107 A Scribner avenue, staten Island , New york city, n y 10301, USA
occupation activist, mobile clergy, electronic preacher of multiple or unique god/s and religions , et al.
title mobile clergy,Political activist USA and around globe; currently he is a u s presidential hopeful / candidate for 2008 electoral competition from Republican Party in New York ; strategist for common / weaker people, disadvantaged people in democracy in usa et al to claim leadership including the 2008 Presidency electoral competition: the weaker people aresegregated and removed from electoral race by stategic powerful block in democracy in U S republic including the news media and news conglomerates. see court actions pending in the main article of Dr kamal Karna Roy.strategist of god/s , religions, people, et al, activist
salary
networth
height = 5′ 8′
weight
term
predecessor
successor
party Republican ( GOP)of usa
boards
religion world religions/ multiple religions in unique body and soul and a proponent of the strategy.
spouse a common law wife
partner
children some, maintained by natural mother concerned
parents
relatives
signature
website
footnotes
Kamal Karna Roy (a/k/a Kamal K.K. Roy, a/k/a Rev. Dr. Joseph Geronimo, Jr.) is a prolific pro se litigant who, since at least the early 1990s, has filed numerous lawsuits throughout the United States and its territories under the names Roy and Joseph Geronimo, Jr., as well as under the names of entities that he is affiliated with, including International Siva Consciousness & World Religions, Reforms International, Handicap Interests International, and Jungle Democracy.Jungle Democracy v. U.S., No. CIV.06-503-SLR, 2006 WL 2616213, at *1 (D. Del. Sept. 12, 2006) Roy’s lawsuits are often brought against multiple defendants, and feature long, unconventional complaints. Roy has filed lawsuits against God, U.S. Presidents, Supreme Court Justices, fast food restaurants, foreign leaders. Roy v. U.S., No. CIV.06-685-SLR 2007 WL 1109296 at *1 (D. Del. Apr. 11, 2007), and Wikipedia http://dockets.justia.com/browse/state-new_hampshire/court-nhdce/noscat-5/ http://www.area603.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=1460&blogId=6 .
Roy’s lawsuits have addressed, among many other things, actions taken by President George W. Bush, overcharging by telecommunication companies, the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts to the Supreme Court, and “failure of democratic societies and God’s role therein.”Id. In 2006 Judge Michael W. McConnell of The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit described a typical Roy complaint:
Roy, a/k/a Joseph Geronimo, Jr. filed a 115-page complaint, a 144-page amended complaint, and a 40-page second amended complaint against over sixty defendants, including among many others President Bush, God as U.S.-based divine benefactor, several government agencies, The New York Times, and Kentucky Fried Chicken. In addition to pages of rambling discourse, the complaint contains numerous illegible handwritten remarks.Jungle Democracy v. USA Government at Washington, DC & at Denver, 206 Fed.Appx. 756 (C.A.10, 2006)
The Tenth Circuit went on to affirm the district court’s dismissal of the complaint holding that no discernible claim was apparent from the complaint. Judge McConnell also humorously noted that the court “strongly suspected at least one defendant was not properly served.”Id. at 757
Most, if not all, of Roy’s complaints have been dismissed. A 2006 United States District Court for the District of Delaware opinion, Jungle Democracy v. U.S., describes Roy as “no stranger to litigation” and provides a partial list of Roy lawsuits that have been dismissed since 1991.Jungle Democracy, 2006 WL 2616213, at *1
Despite Roy’s lack of success in the courts, his lawsuits have been discussed in law school c

I just had a terrible experience with a company who laid down vinyl flooring. I asked that they come and tear up the floor and refund my money. They have honored this request, but are making me sign the below waiver. They tell me that me signing this waiver removes my right to post about my experiences with their company on any review website. Could any of you read this and tell me what provision of this waiver unambiguously states that I am not allowed to publicly share my negative experiences with this company in a public forum? Remember, it cannot be considered ambiguous. Thanks.
—–BEGIN—–
I, [my name], hereby acknowledge receipt of the following consideration [dollar amount] in settlement of any and all claims or complaints I have or may have in the future against [company name] Company in regards to the installation issues of the vinyl at [my address].
Together with, and on behalf of, my respective heirs, beneficiaries, fiduciaries, assigns and successors, I hereby RELEASE, ACQUIT AND FOREVER DISCHARGE [company name] Company, together with its subsidiaries, affiliates, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, successors and/or assigns, from any and all liabilities, manners of action, causes of action, claims and/or demands, both know and unknown, whatsoever, in law or in equity, which have resulted or may result in the future from any alleged nuisance, personal injury, property damage, negligence, breach of contract, tort, violation of local, state or federal law, and/or any other act or omission related to [company name]’s sale of flooring products and/or services described above.
I further declare that I shall keep the terms and conditions of this agreement and all discussions reflecting or relating to it strictly confidential.
I further declare that I have read and reviewed this Release of Claims and fully understand its terms. I expressly understand that by signing this document, I forever give up any and all rights I have, may have had, or may have in the future, to bring any type of legal action against [company name] relating in any way to sale of flooring products and/or service described above, including without limitation any claim based on alleged defects in the product, negligence in installation or other service of such product, or injury to myself, my family, or my property. I further acknowledge that I have entered into this Release of Claims freely and voluntarily, and with intent to be bound thereby.
—–END—–