Posted on 18 July 2012. Tags: cash advance, check, deposit slips, different company, foe, information, law, lawsuit, loaner, local loan company, opend, overdraft fee, pnc, tho, Withdrawal
Hello
I am being taken to court by a local loan company. The lawsuit is for fraud of $330, a $300 loan and $30 processing fee.
The story:
I did go in person and apply for a cash advance and gave my needed information. I did not accept the offer given to me but I did sign a form stating that cash advance store could use my information and contact me with future offers. I said Yes.
5 days later I am charged a $30 fee titled Pacific advance, this was a chased check with my signature. The information for that check stated I had already gave consent and not signature needed. This caused me to go over draft and changed another fee.
Next I called my bank and had them file a despuit o n the check. Apoun doing g so I was refunded for the overdraft fee and the $30 withdrawal has put on hold.
Now 8 days after applying for the loan I was contacted by a law firm in vensse stating a suit was filed on me for fraud.
What the law firm told me:
tho original bank is attempted to do a withdrawal of $30 via check foe the processing of a $300 cash advance . And are charging me with fraud and failure to pay. He then asked if it was true that I applied and received funds of said amount.
I said Yes I did apply and no I didn’t not recive any funds. I also idleness that I did have a $30 fee withdrawal and it was by check by a different company. He then stated that the name was of an affiliate of the loaner.
What I have.
I had my bank forward copies of all transaction s since the account opend and deposit slips to the loan er’s lawer and mine. This showed that no deposit off $300 was ever made.
My lawyer then contacted the loaners lawyer and stated that the charges should be drop since the evidence shows that no loan was given and their client simply pay back the $30 fee. The other lawyer said the y would get back with us.
Now they still want to fallow through and are now wanting $1000 and are taking g my bank to court for $4000 , my bank is pnc.
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 20 September 2011. Tags: acceptance corporation, action!, america affiliates, chase, chase bank, check, conrad, heart, heart check america, las vegas, lawsuit, los angele, vegas nevada
Is there class action in Los angeles against Heart check Amrica?
The lawsuit currently pending in Las Vegas Nevada against Heart Check America and its Heart Check of America affiliates Chase Bank and Conrad Acceptance Corporation. I wander is there any lawsuit or class action in Los Angeles?
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 20 September 2011. Tags: acceptance corporation, action!, america affiliates, chase, chase bank, check, conrad, heart, heart check america, las vegas, lawsuit, los angele, vegas nevada
Is there class action in Los angeles against Heart check Amrica?
The lawsuit currently pending in Las Vegas Nevada against Heart Check America and its Heart Check of America affiliates Chase Bank and Conrad Acceptance Corporation. I wander is there any lawsuit or class action in Los Angeles?
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 28 January 2011. Tags: apon, backoffice, check, email, information, lawsuit, losses, pay per click, paying on time, payment, reciept, taking the time, Yahoo
I sell products online as a affiliate and ive been paid for over 2 years from this company and the company was very greatful, paying on time, and saying thank you, and so on.. Well this month after 15th I got a email that my payment was Processed and shipped to my address. So i have the Reciept with a Check #.
Now its been a week and i email the company, and they inform me that my account is terminated as of 1/22 Now my check was issued 1/15. Before i was terminated. In the policy it states You cannot hold there company to any losses, and anything. But in the same contract it states, if you advertise for them they are required to pay you a commission. Nowhere in the policy does it say they can hold you funds. I would understand they could hold anything made after termination, but the check was issued, but never sent .. and i was terminated after the pay date..
They acussed me of taking possible clicks away from them (sales) when im the one who created the ad on bing/yahoo.com The pay per click / strategy was 100% up to policy and apon Signing up for the program 2 years ago all this information was given apon signup and i was given the GO.
With all this information it will possibly throw off my 1099’s now because in the backoffice it says I WAS PAID for that month yet they did not pay me.. The guy will not answer me and i provided all evidence of my advertising 100% up to policy, i just think they dont wanna pay me.
What do you think? i appreciated anyone taking the time to read this?
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 13 August 2010. Tags: blatant propaganda, cardboard box, class action suit, Free, friend of a friend, kmart, labor, labor unions, lawsuit, management period, Mart, plaintiff, sorry for the confusion, true enemy, wal mart
*Okay, I’ve figured this out…the question was too long, and YahooAnswers cut me off. Sorry for the confusion.*
A friend of a friend was selected for promotion to management at the Wal-Mart where he worked. They drove him to another building nearby, separate from the store, led him into a room – all the while in a very hush-hush, top secret manner – and there he was told to watch a training video. They also made it clear to him that he was not, under any circumstances, to share with others what he had seen in this video. What he did see, in that video, he described as such blatant propaganda, specifically against labor unions, that he was instantly rendered unable to stomach the idea of management, period. He turned down the position. I believe I was even informed that he may have just quit his job entirely. Not sure about that part, this is something I was told about several months ago.
At least in my area, there are attorneys who have been contacted with requests to file a lawsuit against Wal-Mart. Did they take any of these cases? NO. Why? Because Wal-Mart is so big, so powerful, that any isolated lawsuit would stretch on for years, whether or not the plaintiff won at all, and eventually force the plaintiff into sleeping in a cardboard box on the street, because the legal fees alone would destroy their pocketbooks. These attorneys seemed to care too much about the clientele to even bother with such a risk. This is why the class-action suit mentioned above is a class-action suit in the first place…it is the only truly effective fight against such a behemoth. The company remarked that they would find it easier [whatever they mean by that] to treat every case individually, and that seems to tie in with the truth about their “ethics”…or lack thereof…does it not?
Am I the only one who feels that this company, if not others [Target, KMart, others…] is behaving as the true enemy of Capitalism? Is it all a sign that Wal-Mart is a problem for this country [depending on how problematic we view one economic system over another]? Child labor, something that would NEVER happen in America, unless a few rotten incidents happened to slip through the cracks, partnership with communist countries, mistreatment of employees, destruction in any other form it chooses to implement for the sake of itself?
Posted in Affiliate Marketing 101