Affiliate Marketing Secrets

Conservatism means going with tried and proven methods of governance. What that means depends on the culture and history of the country or region. The proven method of governance American Conservatism embraces is the principles of the Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution. The secret to the success of the Constitution is it’s recognition and protection of Natural (Individual) Rights and limited government. These type of rights are inherent in the individual. They do not need an outside enabler, like government, to bestow them or make them work. Limited government means the proper role of government, besides specific powers given to it by the Constitution, is limited to protecting the Individuals rights and liberties, their ability to exercise them.
This framework puts the responsibility for personal success and prosperity on the individual. It gives maximum respect to the individuals abilities as a person, that they know what’s best for themselves, not government that thinks it knows what’s best for them. Natural Rights gives the individual to go as far as their abilities will take them. Conservatives don’t have a problem with inequity in peoples’ lives, just as long as they are not kept from rising above those inequities. Help, when needed comes from interactions of individuals in the private sector, the community and charity in general. The less government involvement, the better, people become dependent on government. Any government help should be as local as possible. Other principles associated with all this is equal opportunity (not equal outcome), equal justice (not social justice), Individualism (not Collectivism), Natural (Individual) Rights, (not “Human” Collective Rights) and charity (not government welfare).
Another part of tried and proven governance is free-market Capitalism. It has been responsible for creating more wealth, for more people (including the poor) than any other system ever devised. When there is a choice between a government run service and a private sector one; the private sector can do it more cost-effectively, efficiently, with more flexibility, with more accountability and with more attentiveness. You take for granted the quality and inexpensiveness of goods that surround you. When business is not loaded down with over-regulation (some regulation is necessary) of government that thinks it knows how to run their businesses better than they can, and taxation to support the big-government welfare State, business can flourish, expand. This creates real, sustainable jobs. Limited government keeps government out of trying to get business to do it’s bidding, playing favorites and getting favored treatment in return (i.e. crony Capitalism). Conservatism has no problem with the profit motive when there is a level playing field that promotes competition. Everyone benefits, a rising tide lifts all boats.
Social Conservatism has a place also. Hopefully, your parents taught you some moral behavior for you to practice out in the world. Social Conservatism just expects this behavior from people. This again, comes from what Conservatism is, tried and proven forms of governance. Religious faith also plays a bigger part (mostly Christianity) with Social Conservatives. Morals are what people do when they think no one is looking, Christians know that God is always looking. The level of moral behavior in an area is directly proportional to the prosperity and overall health of the area.
All this is not because Conservatives don’t care, it’s because they do. Saying “no” sometimes is healthy, not “mean” or “hateful”. What is more sustainable 300 million people (pop of US) being taken care of by government or 300 million people taking care of their own lives? This is not a goal but a healthy guideline. Conservatism is even willing to bend in some areas. It is not dogmatic. Oversteps of the Constitution are often accepted. Conservatives just want to make them better, using the power of the free-market.

As some of us remember with Nixon, the liberal media went after the wrong doings of the Nixon administration, the same way the Boston police went after the Muslim terrorist bomber.
When the Clintons were involved in numerous abuses of power, witness tampering and intimidation, scandals, crimes, with-holding evidence and selling executive pardons for cash, the liberal media stone-walled the wrong doings, as if it was political ” he said, she said” conflict.
Now that its apparent to every Obama apologist and stone-waller, that the Obama regime is deeply involved in a number of abuses of power, scandals and crime, the liberal media is doing everything in their power, to protect their Messiah from political backlash.
How is the liberal media reporting the wrong doings, without suggesting Obama, himself should be accountable? http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/poll-…

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-15…
From the article:
“Tax agency officials told lawmakers in a briefing yesterday that 471 groups received additional scrutiny, a total that indicates a crackdown on politically active nonprofit groups that extends beyond the Tea Party outfits.”
“In early 2011, the IRS denied the tax-exempt status of an affiliate of the San Francisco-based Emerge America, which trains Democratic women to run for office. The agency said it was disqualified because the group’s activities were “conducted primarily for the benefit of a political party and a private group of individuals, rather than the community as a whole.”
“An Austin, Texas-based group, Progress Texas, received a letter from the IRS in February 2013 when it sought nonprofit status. The letter came from the agency’s Laguna Niguel, California, office, which sent essentially the same queries to Republican-leaning groups.
“As with the Tea Party groups, the IRS sought copies of promotional materials, backgrounds of officers, meeting minutes and specifics about activities, such as get-out-the-vote drives, that the organization said it would conduct.”

Can’t decide of you’re a troll or just really stupid….

I got some disturbing answers reflecting tunnel vision & not a lot of thought, just knee jerk defense of Fox. It’s a fact they are biased against Romney, it’s a fact that their reporting is skewed & has been since 2008. It’s a fact that they use memo’s to control the content across all shows but Opinion shows but evidence shows they have been lining up all the shows & even all radio affiliates with a common message. Fox all Fox shows & radio (which was independent in 2008, but not in lock step) play the same themes on the same days. Pound the same stupid little things all day long. That’s how Fox has always worked, but they haven’t used it as much in unfair bias until 2008 against Romney.
Do you think Fox is perfect & uncorruptible? Anyone who critiques them has to be a democrat? They are better than all the other networks, until it comes to primaries then they are usually much more biased, and it’s real & measurable, while their smirks when they speak of Romney less so, but i’ve been watching.
What is wrong with you? You should keep your own house in order. You can’t go after media bias in other networks while ignoring Fox or you’re just another hypocrite. The world has enough of that.
This has been an eye opener, I didn’t consider that Conservatives could be just about as knee jerk and deliberately obtuse as Liberals, but I was obviously wrong.

Conservatives against liberals/Liberals against conservatives: Don’t you ppl see your trained to hate each other?
If you go to any Occupy movement and ask the protesters what they think of the tea party just about all of them will have something negative to say without providing any facts or proof. Just complete talking points from political pundits on MSNBC and liberal Hollywood stars, and I don’t care what anyone says these occupy movements are predominately LIBERAL.
You ask someone who is affiliated with the tea party or someone who supports the message of the tea party and just about all of them also have something negative to say about Occupy movement protesters.
When fact of the matter is BOTH government and Financial institutions are to blame for the destruction of the economy and middle class. Obama’s top advisor’s are from wall street and so was George Bush Jr. so why the fight?
OWS needs the tea party as much as the tea party needs them for if both movements do not come together you will only have Americans against Americans. Which leads me back to my original question
Conservatives against liberals/Liberals against conservatives: Don’t you ppl see your trained to hate each other?
So why