Affiliate Marketing Secrets

I’m 20 years old and a 3rd year University student in FL. I’m involved in a mentor program for my major, and was paired with a 25 year old guy, who I’m really starting to like 🙂
The age difference is no problem for me. I’ve always liked guys who are a few years older, and I’m mature for my age. It seems like a good match. We are both interested in the same things (he graduated from my program a few years ago) although we both have different niche interests.
He is really sweet, very attractive, and oddly quirky. I find him so attractive, but he’s not the kind of guy that all the girls are chasing. I think he likes me too. I’d say we are similarly matched in attractiveness, temperament, and other areas. I really enjoy spending time with him, and always enjoy our conversations. He is so cute, and I can tell he gets nervous sometimes when we talk… I know this might not have anything to do with him liking me, but I like to hope so anyway 😉 I’m really falling for him.
Mentor pairs are not allowed to date while the program is in session (it runs through May) and that’s fine. Neither of us would do anything against this rule, we are both very professional. My fear is that the program will end and we will just remain professional contacts within each others network. I think we could be more than that (and hope we can be!)
I think that (if he knew I liked him) he would make a move, ask me to hang out, etc. aside from professional events we attend together. I think he’s afraid I’d turn him down, or that I’d think he’s too old, etc.
MY QUESTION: How can I subtly let him know I’m interested? I obviously won’t do anything to break rules of the program, but I think I need to plant the seed that I like him before the program ends. The whole relationship is a little awkward because it’s such a professional setting, yet we are both young (and I like to hope) attracted to each other.
How can I test the waters to see if he’s interested in anything more, yet not make things awkward if he doesn’t want anything more from this? I’m one of those girls who always has a little fear that he won’t like me.. I just don’t want it to be awkward if he’s not interested. On the other hand, what if he is interested and we miss out on something great?
And yes—He’s 100% single.

Buy a new T.V. or a entertainment center. Problem solved.

Does a clock’s second hand try to move non-stop around the clock, but it’s somehow stalled so it takes one second to get past each niche?
Or does it stop at each niche, and move to the next one after stopping at each niche for one second?
The question for the first one is what stalls the second hand over each line?
The problem with the second one is that it takes time to move from one point to another, and the second hand couldn’t just travel instantaneously to the next line. For it to work, some parts of the time the second the hand stopped at the niche would have to be equally divided on either side of the second, to give the second hand time to get to the next line. Is that what happens?
Or does it incorporate both, and take half a second to get to the next line, and half a second to pause on each line?
And in all of those, when and/or where does one second stop and the next begin? And what makes the second hand hesitate, wherever it hesitates?

Having some problem Biology question?
1. A student is examining a large, multicellular plant which he believes to represent an entirely new division. The organism produces no pollen or seeds. A cross-section through what appears to be the stem reveals no xylem or phloem tissue. No organs are present. Some specimens have cells that are all haploid; others are composed entirely of diploid cells. The organism cannoth possibly be a(n):
A. Fern D. Vascular plant
B. Alga E. Member of an undiscovered division
C. Moss
2. A child notices two houseflies on the table. One is twice as large as the other. The child asks: “if we feed it plenty of sugars, how long will it take the little fly to grow as big as the big one?”
3.Why are arthropods small?
A. They are the most numerous organisms on the earth.
B. They reproduce rapidly
C. They have exoskeletons
D. Arthropods are a source of food for many other animals
E. They have to fill many ecological niches.
please explain your answer after selecting one of the following. thank you so much

in science i am doing a personal project on cichlids i am going to have information n each cichlid (profiles and stuff) but i also need to do a little thing on cichlids niche what the world would be like without them and where they are on the food chain (what they eat and who eats them) my ol problem is i cant find anything on that stuff ans i was wondering if you could give me basic answers for each of those (not the profiles) and i culd write something big aout t any other facts about cichlids in the wild and where they evovlved from would be greatly appreciated nothing too complicated though as i am in grade 7 please
thanx

Since Nancy Pelosi became Speaker $5 Trillion has been added to the national Debt. The interest alone on this money will mean that taxpayers in USA for the next 20 generations will be heavily burdened if the debt is not Repudiated. If the debt is repudiated, the US government would cease to exist as a solvent going concern. With no ability to borrow from anybody (even China) and with a FICO score of 200, Uncle Sam would be sleeping at a shelter, and eating at the church kitchen.
But that’s not the problem!
If the US government had gotten $5 Trillion worth of goods, services, or benefits to show for the money it has spent, the country would be a pretty decent shape.
Instead the government appears to have gotten Zero dollars worth of ANYTHING for the $5 Trillion it has spent. Nada, Zilch, Nothing to show for that money.
Karzai at least has got his bags of cash from Iran. He may be playing both sides, like a total crook, but like Bonnie and Clyde at least he’s got bags of money to show for it.
Pelosi has nothing to show for the $5 Trillion.
Here’s why.
When agencies go to the Congress for funding, there is about 30 seconds worth of discussion about what they plan to do with the money, how they will spend it, what benefits will be obtained and by whom. The Official from the Agency then says “We are going to work on that”.
Congress says “Oh, OK fine.”
Then the Congress people start making speeches for the record about how great they are.
This goes on for 3 or 4 days.
Then the stupid agency gets their money.
That’s not how venture capital firms work. If they did work that way, they would be out of business real fast.
Venture capitalists have actually had jobs. They have met payrolls. They have sold products. They have made deals.
They want to know everything about how the money will be used and most particularly they want to know what outcomes will be attained.
If a prospective borrower said “I plan to work on that, let me get back to you on that” he would be shown the door in a New York minute.
No actual plans to obtain any actual benefit it required for Congress to appropriet money.
Why?
Because nobody in USA is authorized to tell Congress how to do its work.
Congress can be as crazy as it wants to be.
It can spend $5 Trillion, get nothing and say “Crazy as I wanna be hahahahaha”
The public is always misled.
The problem is not the spending level. It’s the total and complete lack of getting anything in exchange for that spending. It’s the gettting level, which is zero, that’s a big problem. The country isn’t getting anything except a Chinese Fire drill in Iraq, and another one in Afghanistan, and a VA medical care system that does not work, and the Obamacare Chinese Fire Drill that will cost everybody a bundle and deliver not one single thing to anybody ever.
Making America Succeed is a matter of good venture capitalist skills. If there can be a GAO, why can’t there be a GMO (General Management Office) to make sure Congress gets somehting for the money it spends. We need to go beyond “Accounting” and all the way to Fair Market Value Purchases, what used to be called Contracting Oversight.
Congress has no Contracting Oversight so it spends the People’s money very foolishly, and spends its time taking bribes, arranging future bribes, making tedious speeches about how great the members are, praising each other, reading phony material into the record, and passing earmarks for its buddies and campaign contributors (and we can’t tell because they are secret thanks to Citizen United (Scalia the thug at work)).
Teapot Dome was a squared away and morally straight organization compared to today’s Congress, which is like a house of easy women on old Bourbon street.
And it’s all on your credit card. Is that right? Do you approve of that?