Affiliate Marketing Secrets

I’m not sure why there are so many who are desperate to affiliate with others–to make friends, to fit in. I can understand from some point of view why that’s a natural human drive–it makes sense in an evolutionary context–but it’s not something I’m inclined to do. Although others like me, and I have perfectly competent social skills and physical looks, I always back out of any possible friendship with anyone, since I see no point to it, unless it’s for business. I really don’t care about personally knowing people who might be like me. I wouldn’t want to hang out with me; one of us would end up murdering the other at some point for some practical reason.
I’m getting really tired of people wanting to be friends with me. I keep trying to withdraw, but they treat me like I’m their buddy and want to do things with me, which I do not care for with any person. I’ve heard people take pleasure in companionship, but I don’t seem to. I act on my own and achieve what I want on my own. If I need a business relationship, I’ll make one, but I don’t make friendships for no real reason, or as an end in itself.
So what’s up with me? My parents are starting to lose it. I’m 24, and they’re always talking about how schizoid I am, or how I’m in denial about my desire to affiliate. I’m being honest when I say I don’t take pleasure in having things in common with others, or spending time with others. I don’t consider myself socially incompetent or that I’m unable to act social when necessary, but it’s never because I want to, and is for someone else any time I do it. I’m not shy or timid, and can approach people readily without a problem. It’s not a self-esteem thing; my self-esteem is fine, and I’m generally satisfied with things and myself. Others aren’t; they want me to be more social and outgoing, but I have no desire to. My father’s getting more and more frustrated as time goes on and I continue to lack interest in any kind of companionship or long-term relationship. How is that possible that I don’t feel the same way he does?

I’m not sure why there are so many who are desperate to affiliate with others–to make friends, to fit in. I can understand from some point of view why that’s a natural human drive–it makes sense in an evolutionary context–but it’s not something I’m inclined to do. Although others like me, and I have perfectly competent social skills and physical looks, I always back out of any possible friendship with anyone, since I see no point to it, unless it’s for business. I really don’t care about personally knowing people who might be like me. I wouldn’t want to hang out with me; one of us would end up murdering the other at some point for some practical reason.
I’m getting really tired of people wanting to be friends with me. I keep trying to withdraw, but they treat me like I’m their buddy and want to do things with me, which I do not care for with any person. I’ve heard people take pleasure in companionship, but I don’t seem to. I act on my own and achieve what I want on my own. If I need a business relationship, I’ll make one, but I don’t make friendships for no real reason, or as an end in itself.
So what’s up with me? My parents are starting to lose it. I’m 24, and they’re always talking about how schizoid I am, or how I’m in denial about my desire to affiliate. I’m being honest when I say I don’t take pleasure in having things in common with others, or spending time with others. I don’t consider myself socially incompetent or that I’m unable to act social when necessary, but it’s never because I want to, and is for someone else any time I do it. I’m not shy or timid, and can approach people readily without a problem. It’s not a self-esteem thing; my self-esteem is fine, and I’m generally satisfied with things and myself. Others aren’t; they want me to be more social and outgoing, but I have no desire to. My father’s getting more and more frustrated as time goes on and I continue to lack interest in any kind of companionship or long-term relationship. How is that possible that I don’t feel the same way he does?

The jist of it is this:
The reason there is a federal war on drugs is because this ensures there is billions in black market profits (primary cash) available every year. Essentially the drug war doesn’t stop anything, it simply allows the government (and government entities) to control who makes the money. Obviously there would be more than enough to secret CIA missions all over the world.
The reason I ask, is because Ron Paul just doesn’t seem racist. But he DOES seem like someone who would actually believe something like this.
What do you think? Could it be true?

Salaam Alaykom wa rahmatollah wa barakatuh,
in the name of Allah,most gracious,most merciful.
Praise be to Allah, Lord of Creation; Lord and Supporter of the oppressed monotheists; Breaker and Vanquisher of unjust tyrants. Peace and blessings be upon the Seal of the Prophets, and their master; Imam and exemplar of the Mujahideen; and upon his household and his companions and those guided by his guidance; revive his Sunnah until the Day of Judgment.
“Mighty indeed were the plots which they made, but their plots were (well) within the sight of Allah, even though they were such as to shake the hills!” (Quran 14:46)
The American government and Its allies didn’t feel the breezes of the Arabian Hurricane . What started as small breezes from Northern Africa has turned into full-fledged tornadoes, which destroyed parts of the tyrannical U.S supported puppet governments. I’m quite surprised that the American government and Its allies don’t understand that all nations on this planet have a boiling point. The boiling point of the nations is something which can build a powerful nation or destroy it.
The research centers and think tanks of America were not concerned about the removal of the Tunisian government. There are many reasons why they were not concerned. The first reason is that the removal of Ben Ali did not endanger the interests of America in Northern Africa. There is no doubt that the American government has interest in Tunisia but not interest which could harm their economy or their fight against “Terror”. The only tool that was removed from their hands are some secret CIA prisons.
The second reason is that the Tunisian people are not influenced by fundamental ideologies of Al-Qaeda or other Jihady organizations. There is no other country in the world where the government banned Islamic books and Scholars as the former Tunisian Government of Ben Ali. The third reason is that Tunisia is not posing a threat to the Zionist Jews in the so-called state of Israel. These are the main reasons why the American government didn’t spend any time on Tunisia.
If we analyze the second stage of the Hurricane we will find a different approach of America. After they felt the breezes from Tunisia they immediately got involved from the beginning of the Egyptian revolution. There are many reasons why they got involved. The first and most important reason is the security of the so-called state of Israel. Most people do not know how close the American government is with the Egyptian army. The Egyptian Army is essentially a American-Israeli creation. The U.S government has spent billions of dollars for the creation of the Egyptian Army. The task of the Egyptian Army is protecting Israel from any threat and to kill anyone who threatens Israel. What did the Egyptian Army say about the assault on the Israeli Embassy in Cairo? They said that the people who are behind the assault are criminals and enemies of Egypt. While their own buildings are getting demolished they only care about the Jews and the Americans. The Egyptian Army is the biggest Mercenary Company on planet earth.
The second reason is to stop fundamental Islamists from spreading their ideology in the region.
The third reason is to protect strong American companies from falling down.
The second reason caught my attention. I asked myself some questions. How are the Americans going to stop the influence of Fundamental Islamic Ideologies in Egypt? Are they going to detonate explosives in markets and blame it on the Salafi Jihady supporters? This cowardly tactic did not work in Iraq and Pakistan.
So, what are they going to do?
I started to differentiate between the groups who are involved in the revolution. At the first stage I didn’t find anything which could give me an idea about the plots of the crusader governments. But at the second stage I found something remarkable which caught my attention. The “Ikhwan Al-Muslimeen” are being interviewed and mentioned on every Arabic news channel. Al-Jazeera , Al-Arabiya, MBC and other News channels. Before the revolutions we always found awful reports and news articles about the Ikhwan.
What happened during the second stage?
The crusader governments and their allies finally realized that “Ikhwan Al-Muslimeen” is only a name for a political party which has nothing to do with Islam. The Muslims masses are being fooled by this name. There was a time were the Ikhwan were on the right path but those days are over. The Leaders of the Ikhwan are the biggest enemies of Jihad and the Mujahiden. They are the wolves in sheep’s clothing. They use the Islamic religion for the sake of getting a high position. They don’t care if they need to rule with man made laws. They have no problem with Taghut governments in other countries. They have no problems with America. They consider the Mujahiden to be terrorist and criminals.

The jist of it is this:
The reason there is a federal war on drugs is because this ensures there is billions in black market profits (primary cash) available every year. Essentially the drug war doesn’t stop anything, it simply allows the government (and government entities) to control who makes the money. Obviously there would be more than enough to secret CIA missions all over the world.
The reason I ask, is because Ron Paul just doesn’t seem racist. But he DOES seem like someone who would actually believe something like this.
What do you think? Could it be true?

First of all, I am only asking this question about true dinosaurs. I am aware of, but not asking about: Pelycosaurs, which lived before the dinosaurs; or Crocodilians, which lived before, with, and after them, etc…. It seems that every purely carnivorous dinosaur fossil we have found has been a two-legged Therapod. We have found bipedal herbivorous dinosaurs, but no quadrupedal carnosaurs. Is there a theory as to a reason behind this? Were Therapods simply first and “guarded their niche” successfully, or is there a good reason why a quadrupedal carnosaur wouldn’t be successful. Or, is it simply that we haven’t found their fossils yet?