Posted on 18 May 2012. Tags: acts of war, american, american citizen, Blur, Citizen, congressional effort, constitutional law, domestic courts, indefinite detention, legal practices, loss, military courts, person, speedy trial, subversion
It’s exceptionally important to maintain existing legal standards, that already address an American citizen functioning with alien interests. That distinction is recognized in the charge of “treason”, which makes an American a foreign actor–instead of a citizen.
This is exceptionally important as it relates to the standing rights of average Americans. In domestic courts as well as military courts, each person is already entitled to a trial–that has never been legitimately revoked. Foreigners charged with attacking Americans, are maintained in courts designated for foreign actors.
Should a charge against an American be that they are alien or treasonous–they are charged in the domestic court unless they are affiliated with a foreign entity.
Should there be an inversion of the domestic legal standards (speedy trial vs indefinite detention w/o trial) it is the subversion of Constitutional law that takes the greatest loss.
That subversion is being presented in this Congressional effort.
The greater loss is extended to the American people, and not those who attack the USA. An error of judgment or special interest as dictated by an authority, is a potential for a great loss that cannot fairly be overcome through existing legal practices.http://news.yahoo.com/confrontation-brew…
Posted in Featured Articles
Posted on 02 February 2011. Tags: competence levels, extrovert, face, few words, Gap, interview feedback, interviewers, introvert, minority, new acquaintances, niche, personality, stranger, subversion, US-has
Mr. X has always been within the top 5% performance niche in academics and generally performs well to outstanding at jobs.
Mr. X is more an introvert than extrovert. He spends most of the time alone but can get very open once used to new acquaintances.
Mr. X is “aggressive”. Does not invite subversion sometimes real/sometimes perceived and tends to stand out against subversion. He doesn’t kiss behind.
Mr. X isn’t very successful with women. Even after letting guard down, girls are receptive at first then start ignoring X. X tries to bridge the gap then cuts himself from the lady if non-response endures. Basically, he treats her like a stranger.
People tend to fear Mr. X. His naturally stern face coupled with his few words cause most to “avoid” confronting X.
Mr. X-a minority in US-has difficulty securing jobs despite high competence levels and very positive interview feedback from interviewers-when it’s a bad one you know it and they don’t complement it.
Describe Mr. X in whatever trait categories u prefer. Thanks.
Posted in Affiliate Marketing 101